quotes:
>We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
>We believe in: rough consensus and running code.
>-- David Clark
Well that was certainly an elegant concept for a more civilized age, but it's
been:
We used to reject: kings, presidents and voting.
We believed in: ro
On 2013-10-06 02:52, d...@geer.org wrote:
We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and running code.
Which gave us IEEE 802.11
Which, like "Occupy Wall Street", worked by consensus.
___
cryptography mailing list
crypt
As we're down a rat hole now, perhaps this can be the last word:
We reject: kings, presidents and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and running code.
-- David Clark
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
ht
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 4:21 AM, ianG wrote:
> Long Live Competition!
There should be no King to serve, no Committee to subvert, only an open Process.
___
cryptography mailing list
cryptography@randombit.net
http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cr
On 4/10/13 01:39 AM, James A. Donald wrote:
On 2013-10-04 03:45, Adam Back wrote:
Is it just me or could we better replace NIST by DJB ? ;) He can do
that EC
crypto, and do constant time coding (nacl), and non-hackable mail servers
(qmail), and worst-time databases (cdb). Most people in the wo
