On 5/03/13 02:42 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Quoting http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0027.html#signing:
Signing enables a sender to verify that they sent a certain block of text.
[...] The text that is signed MAY be the empty string.
(There's no metadata or anything there, just a raw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/5/13 5:17 AM, ianG wrote:
On 5/03/13 02:42 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Quoting http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0027.html#signing:
Signing enables a sender to verify that they sent a certain
block of text. [...] The text that is signed MAY be
Quoting http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0027.html#signing:
Signing enables a sender to verify that they sent a certain block of text.
[...] The text that is signed MAY be the empty string.
(There's no metadata or anything there, just a raw signature).
Peter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/4/13 4:42 PM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Quoting http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0027.html#signing:
Signing enables a sender to verify that they sent a certain block
of text. [...] The text that is signed MAY be the empty string.
(There's no
Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im writes:
No one uses XEP-0027 these days, they all use OTR. The PGP integration with
XMPP clients was an early experiment in the Jabber community before we even
called it XMPP. Think 13+ years ago. But clients never signed empty strings,
although we never fixed
