On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 10:58:40AM +0200, Guus Sliepen wrote:
1. Measure. Don't speculate.
I found a benchmark here:
https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns/blob/master/rfcs/benchmark.txt
So it seems that is not as slow as I suspected: it can forward packets at a
rate of 7 Gbit/s on an
On 05.10.2012 10:58, Guus Sliepen wrote:
I found a benchmark here:
https://github.com/cjdelisle/cjdns/blob/master/rfcs/benchmark.txt
So it seems that is not as slow as I suspected: it can forward packets at a
rate of 7 Gbit/s on an Opteron 6128.
I think you have misread. The benchmark
AFAIK the key is just generated once and then hashes are generated in two
rounds, if it is 0xFC at the first try it's done, otherwise it runs more
checksum rounds in groups of two.
Den 4 okt 2012 22:55 skrev Guus Sliepen g...@sliepen.org:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Eugen Leitl
On 10/4/12 4:45 PM, Guus Sliepen g...@sliepen.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 02:37:53PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I've recently become interested in cjdns
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cjdns
which apparently used NaCl in UDP over tun when tunneling.
I'm not aware of any review of the
