Efficiency is relative. Vs a central bank and Brands credentials its
inefficient - a handful of modexps vs say one hundred or a thousand. Vs
bitcoin with longest hash chain wins, and minimum hash being 10 minutes work
for the entire network, I think straight DLREP on all the coins in a time
inte
"James A. Donald" writes:
>On 2011-06-15 1:29 AM, Ian G wrote:
>> Which, to my mind was the same sin as the alternate: obsession with
>> privacy, including to the extent of eliminating the core requirements of
>> money. The first law of money is that it has to be safe:
>>
>> http://forum.bitcoin.o
On 2011-06-15 1:29 AM, Ian G wrote:
Which, to my mind was the same sin as the alternate: obsession with
privacy, including to the extent of eliminating the core requirements of
money. The first law of money is that it has to be safe:
http://forum.bitcoin.org/index.php?topic=16457.0
This is the
On 14/06/11 6:13 PM, Adam Back wrote:
See also:
Auditable Anonymous Electronic Cash by Tomas Sander and Amnon Ta-Shma
in crypto 1998.
http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~amnon/Papers/ST.crypto99.pdf
...
In their setting Sander & Ta-Shma also can identify double-spenders because
their identity is inclu
On 2011-06-14 6:13 PM, Adam Back wrote:
See also:
Auditable Anonymous Electronic Cash by Tomas Sander and Amnon Ta-Shma
in crypto 1998.
http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~amnon/Papers/ST.crypto99.pdf
Its basically the idea of using non-interactive zero knowlede proof of
membership in a list of coins a
See also:
Auditable Anonymous Electronic Cash by Tomas Sander and Amnon Ta-Shma
in crypto 1998.
http://www.math.tau.ac.il/~amnon/Papers/ST.crypto99.pdf
Its basically the idea of using non-interactive zero knowlede proof of
membership in a list of coins as an alternative to blinding.
The intere
