On 6/16/14, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
The revelation that a crypto company was patenting a backdoor in an
international standard is indeed faith-shattering. Details aside...
Tanja Lange points out that the original filing by Certicom covered both
escrow and anti-escrow. Oh, my, how
On 16/06/2014 04:27 am, Thierry Moreau wrote:
On 2014-06-15 19:24, Tanja Lange wrote:
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 02:13:04PM +0100, ianG wrote:
Or is this impossible to reconcile? If Certicom is patenting backdoors,
the only plausible way I can think of this is that it intends to wield
