Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks

2013-07-22 Thread Tony Arcieri
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Sean Beck wrote: > Does it look encrypted? > Encrypted with a virus -- Tony Arcieri ___ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography

Re: [cryptography] Must have seemed like a good idea at the time

2013-07-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* James A. Donald: > This not all that fatal, as the money is traceable, but it means that > the financial institution needs an apparatus to reverse cell phone > transactions, and that cell phone money is therefore soft on the may > scale. This has been the case for giro payments for a while, and

Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks

2013-07-22 Thread Randall Webmail
- Original Message - From: "John Young" To: "Riad S. Wahby" , "grarpamp" , cypherpu...@cpunks.org, cryptography@randombit.net Sent: Monday, July 22, 2013 4:42:48 AM Subject: Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks >Opposition, disgust, revulsion, ridicule toward al-qaeda >is perfectly cypherpunki

Re: [cryptography] Cypherpunks

2013-07-22 Thread John Young
Opposition, disgust, revulsion, ridicule toward al-qaeda is perfectly cypherpunkian. Never, ever unanimous nor what's acceptable without merciless, obnoxious, off-topic digression argument. "Fuck that to death." - A Sage "Cypherpunks" -- the name, the adventure, the rise and fall, and multiple re

Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:41 AM, Adam Back wrote: > Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. > > It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential > subscribers... > > Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential subscribers. Though

Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:41:14AM +0200, Adam Back wrote: > Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. > > It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential > subscribers... > > Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential subscriber

Re: [cryptography] a Cypherpunks comeback

2013-07-22 Thread Adam Back
Could you please get another domain name, that name is just ridiculous. It might tickle your humour but I guarantee it does not 99% of potential subscribers... Unless your hidden objective is to drive away potential subscribers. Adam On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 11:07:26AM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote: