Inquiry about emissions at NSA UDC and other data centers
was not for external capture but about internal protection from
its own emanating equipment. In particular EM interference by
the big generators at most of the facilities, electrical sub-stations,
processing racks, cabling, switches,
More specifically inadvertent emissions like Non-Stop,
acoustic, vibratory, olfactory, echo, refractory, extent,
periodicity, amplitude, array, those still loosely or firmly
classified. Those somewhat treated of sea and space
borne vessels by degaussing, presumably more difficult
for aged
On Thu, Aug 01, 2013 at 05:32:55PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:57 PM, wasa bee wasabe...@gmail.com wrote:
... If everyone does their part CT causes the risk
of dishonest CA behavior
On 1 August 2013 22:32, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 5:04 PM, Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:57 PM, wasa bee wasabe...@gmail.com wrote:
... If everyone does their part CT causes the risk
of dishonest CA behavior
On 01/08/13 22:04, Nico Williams wrote:
If you're in a position to know what CAs are allowed to issue certs
for a given name, then you can check for (audit) a) issuance of certs
for that name by unauthorized CAs, b) issuance of new certs by
authorized CAs but for unauthorized public keys.
who's
Figured some here might be interrested in this...
Our password cracking contest started about 4 hours ago. Register
online and play along at home!
Or just watch the pretty stats as the participants duke it out.
http://contest-2013.korelogic.com/
And I really need to go to bed.
--
You
