Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Natanael
No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile? - Sent from my phone Den 1 nov 2013 05:11 skrev coderman coder...@gmail.com: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider.

Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Dave Howe
On 01/11/2013 12:04, Natanael wrote: No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile? From the url in the key, I am assuming it is a tor hidden service, hence you would need a local MTA able to route over TOR. tempted to have a go myself this weekend, given I haven't seen a

Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Zack Weinberg
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Dave Howe davehowe.pentest...@gmail.com wrote: On 01/11/2013 12:04, Natanael wrote: No hints at what kind of client it takes? Custom config or recompile? From the url in the key, I am assuming it is a tor hidden service, hence you would need a local MTA able

Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: my contempt for email is well known and reinforced by choice of provider. there are myriad rebuttals to email as private channel, of which i agree fully.

Re: [cryptography] coderman's keys

2013-11-01 Thread Kelly John Rose
Same here, I'm fairly confident mine wasn'T encrypted correctly. On 01/11/2013 11:47 AM, Jeffrey Goldberg wrote: On 2013-10-31, at 11:11 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 7:55 PM, coderman coder...@gmail.com wrote: my contempt for email is well known and