>The point is block lists suck, they're always blocking false things,
>and vigilante abusive takes 3x longer to take you off than for you to
>complain or unresponsive etc.
The most amazing thing just happened. Last night I went to bed in
2014, and today, based on the messages I'm reading, it is 1
On Thu, 1 Jan 2015, Sadiq Saif wrote:
> Spamhaus is one that does this [expanding listings for the
> intransigent].
I think they start targeting the corporate servers, too, to drive the
point home to the suits.
More power to 'em... If it wasn't for DNSBLs, email would not be
possible (someth
On 1/1/2015 14:18, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Some of them willfully misclassify.
>
> In the past, one of the blacklist services used to escalate the range
> of the blacklist surrounding an IP if a provider/ISP did not stop a
> spammer. The blacklist range was made ever broader to apply pressure
> to
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Sadiq Saif wrote:
> On 1/1/2015 13:40, Adam Back wrote:
>> nah what am I thinking probably! 1988 if not earlier, 27 years :)
>>
>> The point is block lists suck, they're always blocking false things,
>> and vigilante abusive takes 3x longer to take you off than for
On Dec 31, 2014, at 5:16 AM, John Young wrote:
> http://cryptome.org/2014/12/gilmore-crypto-censored.htm
I would say that I am sorry for this off-topic rant, but if I were sufficiently
sorry, I wouldn’t be sending it.
I used to be a postmaster for a medium-sized university and
worked as a consu
On Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:35:43 -0800, Kevin W. Wall
wrote:
Seems as though this interview might be of interest to those on these
lists. I've not listened to it yet so I don't know how interesting it may
be.
Pauldotcom has a good interview with Diffie too
http://securityweekly.com/2013/08/1
On 1/1/2015 13:40, Adam Back wrote:
> nah what am I thinking probably! 1988 if not earlier, 27 years :)
>
> The point is block lists suck, they're always blocking false things,
> and vigilante abusive takes 3x longer to take you off than for you to
> complain or unresponsive etc.
DNSBLs do occasi
nah what am I thinking probably! 1988 if not earlier, 27 years :)
The point is block lists suck, they're always blocking false things,
and vigilante abusive takes 3x longer to take you off than for you to
complain or unresponsive etc.
They'll also falsely block you not because your config is inse
Seems as though this interview might be of interest to those on these
lists. I've not listened to it yet so I don't know how interesting it may
be.
-kevin
P.S. - Happy Gnu Year to all of you.
Sent from my Droid; please excuse typos.
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Gary McGraw"
Date
He's been running an open relay since like 2000 or something... why
not its his relay.
Adam
On 1 January 2015 at 18:40, Sadiq Saif wrote:
> On 12/31/2014 07:16, John Young wrote:
>> http://cryptome.org/2014/12/gilmore-crypto-censored.htm
>
> Don't run an open mail relay and your IP will be off
On 12/31/2014 07:16, John Young wrote:
> http://cryptome.org/2014/12/gilmore-crypto-censored.htm
Don't run an open mail relay and your IP will be off the blacklist.
Why are you running an open relay in 2014?
--
Sadiq Saif
https://staticsafe.ca
___
cryp
11 matches
Mail list logo
