----- Forwarded message from Brian Warner <war...@lothar.com> ----- From: Brian Warner <war...@lothar.com> Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:09:40 -0700 To: tahoe-...@tahoe-lafs.org Subject: Re: [tahoe-dev] pycryptopp benchmarks User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120313 Thunderbird/11.0 Reply-To: Tahoe-LAFS development <tahoe-...@tahoe-lafs.org>
On 3/21/12 11:00 AM, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote: > On 64-bit servers, the it costs something around 10 *nanoseconds* per > byte, and on François's little low-power ARM box, it costs about 200 > nanoseconds per byte. FYI, djb and friends just published a paper about high-speed crypto on ARM processors with the "NEON" vector instruction set (which includes the iPad 1 and iPhone 4), specifically the NaCl algorithms (Salsa20, Poly1305, Curve25519, and Ed25519). They got encryption down to 5.6 CPU cycles per byte. http://cr.yp.to/highspeed/neoncrypto-20120320.pdf cheers, -Brian _______________________________________________ tahoe-dev mailing list tahoe-...@tahoe-lafs.org http://tahoe-lafs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tahoe-dev ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE _______________________________________________ cryptography mailing list cryptography@randombit.net http://lists.randombit.net/mailman/listinfo/cryptography