I have been looking at this proposal as well and it certainly has potential
to make a comeback and be an actual standard, I wonder what the openpgp
authors have to say, fabio, did you forward this to the openpgp list by any
chance?
Jurre
2013/9/11 Lodewijk andré de la porte
> 2013/9/10 David D
2013/9/10 David D
> Quote, " You've got to think (NSA claims to be the biggest employer of
> mathematicians) that seeing the illegal activities the US has been getting
> up to with the fruits of their labour that they may have a mathematician
> retention or motivation problem on their hands."
>
>
: Ian Brown; cryptography@randombit.net
Subject: Re: [cryptography] Forward Secrecy Extensions for OpenPGP: Is this
still a good proposal?
You know coincidentally we (the three authors of that paper) were just
talking about that very topic in off-list (and PGP encrypted:) email.
I remain keen on forward-
You know coincidentally we (the three authors of that paper) were just
talking about that very topic in off-list (and PGP encrypted:) email.
I remain keen on forward-secrecy, and it does seem to be in fashion again
right now.
Personally I think we in the open community need to up our game an ord
Hi all,
i just read about this internet draft "Forward Secrecy Extensions for
OpenPGP" available at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brown-pgp-pfs-03 .
Is it a still good proposal?
Should it be revamped as an actual improvement of currently existing use
of OpenPGP technology?
--
Fabio Pietros
