On 04/14/2012 06:39 AM, David Adamson wrote:
SO: I expect a new hash competition (run by EU, Russia, China or
Japan) where US SHA-3 standard will be a reference point and the goal
will be to design 256 and 512 bits hash function that is 3-4 times
faster than SHA-3.
Agree.
For EU we'll
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:17:52PM +0200, CodesInChaos wrote:
I for one am not happy with the choice. It's slower in software than
blake or skein, and on ARM it's even slower than SHA-2.
There is more to the decision than performance.
I'm not convinced that using a construction that's
I for one am not happy with the choice. It's slower in software than
blake or skein, and on ARM it's even slower than SHA-2.
I'm not convinced that using a construction that's significantly
different from MD gains us much. The constructions are often provably
secure, so we only need to care about
On 3/10/12 14:10 PM, Landon Hurley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thoughts?
Very welcome - it does set the scene for the next decade for those of us
who are free to chose the best algorithms for the job.
We'll just choose KECCAK. Although, see question at end.
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Thoughts? It wasn't the algorithm I had anticipated, but does anyone
really anticipate this seeing any wide spread adoption without a huge
delay in between?
//landon
- Original Message
Subject: NIST Selects Winner of Secure Hash
