Re: [cryptography] [Cryptography] Secure universal message addressing

On Apr 4, 2016, at 7:55 AM, Natanael wrote: > The key idea here is that you get to have *one* identifier for yourself under > your control, that you can use everywhere, securely. Knowing that people have > your real address should provide a strong guarantee that messages

Re: [cryptography] [Cryptography] Secure universal message addressing

- Sent from my phone Den 5 apr. 2016 09:17 skrev "John Gilmore" : > > > The key idea here is that you get to have *one* identifier for yourself > > under your control, that you can use everywhere, securely. > > The key idea here is a bad idea. > > I don't want everyone I interact

Re: [cryptography] Secure universal message addressing

On 4/04/2016 15:55 pm, Natanael wrote: After spending way too much time thinking about how to design a secure universal message passing platform that would work for both IM, email, push messages and much more, I just ended up with a more complex version of XMPP that won't really ever have lower

[cryptography] Secure universal message addressing

I'm crossposting this to a few lists, a few of the relevant mail archives are here for those who want to follow the replies on the other lists; http://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/ http://lists.randombit.net/pipermail/cryptography/