On 31/07/13 03:52 AM, Peter Gutmann wrote:
Marcus Brinkmann marcus.brinkm...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de writes:
If you trust anonymous leaks to the Financial Review by members of your
favourite spying agency network, then I guess its evidence.
More importantly, look at the dates:
The ban was
On IBM's watch, right. But the Thinkpads were manufactured by Lenova in
China well before that; what IBM sold was the franchise rights.
And so where does Cisco and Juniper gear come from again... ?
___
cryptography mailing list
On 31/07/13 11:46 AM, grarpamp wrote:
On IBM's watch, right. But the Thinkpads were manufactured by Lenova in
China well before that; what IBM sold was the franchise rights.
And so where does Cisco and Juniper gear come from again... ?
Indeed. Methinks the Australian pollies have been
2013/7/31 grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com
And so where does Cisco and Juniper gear come from again... ?
Let's not argue about whether Taiwan is China or The People's Republic of
China is China ;)
They do use foxxcon, but it's not clear whatfor. I can imagine they use
foxconn for non-sensitive
grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
And so where does Cisco and Juniper gear come from again... ?
Cisco has factories in China, in at least Suzhou Hefei. They
also have RD centers in at least Shanghai Hefei:
http://cisco-news.tmcnet.com/news/2011/11/25/5954051.htm
It might be important to get this into the record for threat modelling.
The suggestion that normally-purchased hardware has been compromised
by the bogeyman is often poo-pooed, and paying attention to this is
often thought to be too black-helicopterish to be serious. E.g., recent
discussions
On 07/30/2013 01:07 PM, ianG wrote:
It might be important to get this into the record for threat modelling.
The suggestion that normally-purchased hardware has been compromised by
the bogeyman is often poo-pooed, and paying attention to this is often
thought to be too black-helicopterish to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 30, 2013, at 4:07 AM, ianG i...@iang.org wrote:
It might be important to get this into the record for threat modelling. The
suggestion that normally-purchased hardware has been compromised by the
bogeyman is often poo-pooed, and paying
Marcus Brinkmann marcus.brinkm...@ruhr-uni-bochum.de writes:
If you trust anonymous leaks to the Financial Review by members of your
favourite spying agency network, then I guess its evidence.
More importantly, look at the dates:
The ban was introduced in the mid-2000s after intensive
