These are some of the papers to be presented at Crypto 2001 in August[1]:
A Chosen Ciphertext Attack On RSA Optimal Asymmetric Encryption
Padding (OAEP) as Standardized In PKCS #1
James Manger
OAEP Reconsidered
Victor Shoup
RSA--OAEP is Secure Under the RSA Assumption
Ei
David Koontz wrote:
>Is the average person susceptible to TEMPEST attacks?
[And more on TEMPEST technics.]
Probably most people are not subject to TEMPEST attacks
in the same way they are not in need in crypto.
And as crypto protection gets built in to consumer products
as understanding for th
Is the average person susceptible to TEMPEST attacks?
"Arnold G. Reinhold" wrote:
>
> TEMPEST is not shut down by any means. This decision applies to homes
> and places where there is an reasonable expectation of privacy (like
> a phone booth). The status of computers in offices, cars, and publi
At 12:55 PM 06/04/2001 -0400, Lenny Foner wrote:
>So we now have at least two people who've confirmed my expectation,
>namely that one can feasibly encrypt the entire cable. (After all,
>I know what's involved in making fast, special-purpose chips to do
>varous sorts of digital operations, and th
At 07:51 AM 6/7/01 +0800, Enzo Michelangeli wrote:
>If you do that, you inherit the drawbacks of TCP for real time
>communications: a single packet lost may disrupt the communication for a
I've looked at PGPfone source, it uses UDP, as it should.
---
>"Is thermal imaging more like going through your garbage (which courts
>have allowed) or more like looking into your window with a high-powered
>telescope (for which courts generally require a warrant)?"
off the top of my head, i'd have to say that anyone *intelligent*
would be able to see that
At 8:57 AM -0700 6/12/2001, John Young wrote:
>The Supreme Court's decision against thermal imaging appears
>to be applicable to TEMPEST emissions from electronic devices.
>And is it not a first against this most threatening vulnerability
>in the digital age? And long overdue.
>
>Remote acquisitio
