M Taylor wrote:
The UK Communications-Electronics Security Group (CESG), the defensive
arm of the GCHQ, have published details about another PKC concept,
identity-based PKC, where every user's public key are predetermined by an
unique identifier, such as email address. It does use a(/two)
It's time to consider moving the annual Crypto conference out of
Santa Barbara. The obvious places are Vancouver, Toronto, or
Mexico. I know zilch about these places as conference venues.
Could someone knowledgable summarize the relative merits?
Rich Schroeppel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:13 PM -0700 on 7/31/01, Richard Schroeppel wrote:
It's time to consider moving the annual Crypto conference out of
Santa Barbara. The obvious places are Vancouver, Toronto, or
Mexico. I know zilch about these places as conference venues.
Could someone knowledgable summarize the
Why do you say it's time to move the conference? AFAIK, it's ALWAYS
been in SB. Too bad I can't make it this year :(
-derek
Richard Schroeppel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's time to consider moving the annual Crypto conference out of
Santa Barbara. The obvious places are Vancouver,
On Friday 27 July 2001 11:13, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Declan McCullagh writes:
One of those -- and you can thank groups like ACM for this, if my
legislative memory is correct -- explicitly permits encryption
research. You can argue fairly persuasively that it's
At 01:13 PM 7/27/2001, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
It's certainly not broad enough -- it protects encryption research,
and the definition of encryption in the law is meant to cover just
that, not cryptography. And the good-faith effort to get permission
is really an invitation to harrassment,
This also looks very similar to my Master's Thesis, where I even use
the term digital ticket! Sheesh.
-derek
Peter Wayner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I discuss this in both editiions of _Digital Cash_. I wonder if this
is prior art that reads against the patent.
-Peter
--
Derek
