--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
From: Tomas Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management
2001: Call for Participation
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 15:48:04 -0700
[Apologies if you receive this more than once]
The paper concludes that either there is not much stego on the net,
or it's a different kind of stego, or stego users choose good
passwords. A fourth possibility is that we used the wrong
dictionary. But I suspect that love, hockey, and jesus probably
aren't the top choices for passwords among
Heh.
I've been arguing for YEARS that classic firewalls, as they have been
used for even more years, have been a disservice to network security.
You know, the whole hard, crunchy exterior with soft, chewy interior
sort of thing. Instead if we had ubiquitous multi-level secure
services (using
using x9.59 for all account-based transactions would put debit credit on
a level playing field with regard to authenticated transactions (and
promotes debit use over the internet).
besides the significant difference in merchant cost infrastructure between
the two ... the other remaining
[Moderator's note: This is getting off topic --Perry]
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 03:06:57PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
By far the best assember I ever saw from a C compiler came from
Watcom's. I'm sure I remember hearing they open sourced it a while back.
Or did I dream that?
No, you heard
Ian Goldberg wrote something above this:
[Moderator's note: The best DES implementations for i386s in assembler
are several times faster than the best in C. I'm not sure about AES
but I'd prefer to try and see. Perhaps it's a feature of DES's odd bit
manipulation patterns, perhaps not. I have
On Mon, 24 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it was so easy ... it wouldn't be a problem. An objective of the
original e-commerce deployments was that the account number file not be
co-located on the webserver. Since a large number of subsequent deployments
have co-located on the
