Being a numb skull in such things does it mean IPSEC VPN is not secure?
At present im running 1024bit the cpu hit is high, going to 2048 i
suspect / told its even higher
:(
regards,
Thing
bear wrote:
[Moderator's inquiry: Any third parties care to comment on this? --Perry]
On Thu, 21
At 11:49 AM -0800 2/25/02, bear wrote:
...
The secure forever level of difficulty that we used to believe
we got from 2kbit keys in RSA is apparently a property of 6kbit
keys and higher, barring further highly-unexpected discoveries.
Highly-unexpected? All of public key cryptography is build
This is the not-really-9/11 case that shut down *all* Department of the
Interior access to the net this fall...
Cheers,
RAH
--
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/02/26/technology/26INDI.html?todaysheadlines=pagewanted=print
February 26, 2002
U.S. Agency's Computers Didn't Protect Indian Fund
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 21:24:59 +
From: Robin Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [camram-spam] distributed checksum clearing house
Don't know if
...and the music plays one more time, with one less chair...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:30:02 -0800
Subject: Don't know how you missed this one ;-)
From: Somebody
To: R. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
