Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)

2002-07-23 Thread jamesd
-- On 22 Jul 2002 at 15:39, David Honig wrote: You should be able to use any source which you know is not a PRNG as the entropy-source in a true RNG. You should be able to use entropy (and stat tests) to measure the source entropy after digitization. You cannot measure entropy

Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)

2002-07-23 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, David Honig wrote: Yes, it is a joke. However, it is also a viable if low-bandwidth entropy source. I disagree that you need to be able to model I've got a framegrabber with a 640x480 24 bit/pixel camera. It doesn't compress, is rather noisy, and since self-adjusting I

Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)

2002-07-23 Thread Derek Atkins
John S. Denker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Source -- Digitizer -- Simple hash -- Whitener (e.g., DES) OK, we have DES as an example of a whitener. -- Can somebody give me an example of a simple hash that performs irreversible compression of the required kind? I can give you a number of

Re: building a true RNG

2002-07-23 Thread John S. Denker
Eugen Leitl wrote: ... framegrabber with a 640x480 24 bit/pixel camera. It doesn't compress, is rather noisy, and since self-adjusting I get the maximum entropy at maximum darkness. OK. Evidently it's dominated by thermal noise, not to be confused with the Poisson noise recently featured

Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)

2002-07-23 Thread bear
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, John S. Denker wrote: David Honig wrote yet another nice note: I'm not trying to be dense, but I'm totally not understanding the distinction here. The following block diagram is excellent for focussing the discussion, (thanks): Source -- Digitizer -- Simple hash --

Re: building a true RNG (was: Quantum Computing ...)

2002-07-23 Thread Jack Lloyd
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, John S. Denker wrote: -- I am told (but don't understand) that there might exist a weaker hash that somehow does require whitening. This is the point of the conversation. Please address this point if you can. Perhaps they were refering to something like