On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
>Anything that is good, gets ported a lot. Anything that is
>ported a lot gets build/port problems.
Actually, I've found the reverse to be true. Anything that gets
ported a lot eventually gets all the portability crap straightened
out so that portin
--
On 2 Dec 2002 at 19:19, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> I have to admit that Crypto++'s build/port problems suck, a
> lot. I still have a weird fondness for it (Stockholm
> Syndrome?).
Anything that is good, gets ported a lot. Anything that is
ported a lot gets build/port problems.
If, on the other
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2002 12:25:39 -0500
From: Zooko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mnet-devel] Ditching crypto++ for pycrypto
I have to admit that Crypto++'s build/port problems suck, a lot. I still have
