to embed this functionality in a virus.
Certainly it could be included in freeware available on the 'net. I've also
been looking at the possibility of steganographically hiding
functionality, and while I can't do it yet, I'm convinced it could be done.
Any other suggestions for how to ban crypto? I can't
On 16 Sep 2001, at 17:26, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Any other suggestions for how to ban crypto? I can't think of anything
that would actually work against terrorists.
Hmmm... we should be careful not to restrict the discussion of
potential (non-)effects of coming restrictive legislative
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
At 05:26 PM 9/16/2001 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Bin-Laden was at one time said to use stego in posted images for
comms.
I heard that restated today on NPR by an ex-FBI commentator.
I think it is ironic that Congress passed a law a while ago
In message 3.0.5.32.20010916141240.01b7eee0@localhost, Carl Ellison writes:
At 05:26 PM 9/16/2001 +0100, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Bin-Laden was at one time said to use stego in posted images for
comms.
I heard that restated today on NPR by an ex-FBI commentator.
I think it is ironic that
On Sun, 16 Sep 2001, Angelos D. Keromytis wrote:
Niels Provos (U. of Michigan) has a very interesting paper on detecting
steganography on the network (he talked about it during the USENIX Sec.
WIP session). Basically, he didn't find any steganography in about 2
million images he tested on
At 06:58 PM 9/16/01 +0200, Axel H Horns wrote:
During the
past years I managed to convince a handful of clients and colleagues
to make use of PGP in order to protect confidential information when
sending e-mail messages.
Of course, if PGP would be banned in Germany by some legislation I
would
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam
Weiler writes:
That (excellent) paper was in the refereed track, not the WiPs:
http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec01/provos.html
http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/stego/
http://www.outguess.org/
The above URLs point to the first
