Relevence to the Pd debate is that banks may in future insist on remote
attestation of users' software (however practically possible that is)
so
that they can attempt to dump yet more liability on their users
(Ladies and
gentlemen of the jury, Mr Doe's claim that he did not authorise this
At 01:07 PM 9/17/2002 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, banks assume that a certain percentage of their
transactions will be bad and build that cost into their business
model. Credit and ATM cards and numbers are as far from secure as could
be, far less secure than somebody
At 1:07 PM -0700 on 9/17/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I know, banks assume that a certain percentage of their
transactions will be bad and build that cost into their business
model. Credit and ATM cards and numbers are as far from secure as
could be, far less secure than somebody
