what is GPG's #1 objective: security or anti-patent stance ( Re: on the state of PGP compatibility (2nd try))

Hi I've trimmed the Cc line a bit as this is now focussing more on GPG and not adding any thing new technically for the excluded set. On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 06:08:14PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: The OpenPGP spec handles compatibility issues quite well. The catch, of course, is that PGP 2.x

Re: authentication protocols

- Original Message - From: John Saylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 3:14 PM Subject: authentication protocols I'd like to find an authentication protocol that fits my needs: 1. 2 [automated] parties 2. no trusted 3rd party intemediary ['Trent'

Re: what is GPG's #1 objective: security or anti-patent stance ( Re: on the state of PGP compatibility (2nd try))

On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:34:35AM +0100, Adam Back wrote: Hi I've trimmed the Cc line a bit as this is now focussing more on GPG and not adding any thing new technically for the excluded set. On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 06:08:14PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: The OpenPGP spec handles