At 02:47 PM 9/21/2002 +1200, Peter Gutmann wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some of the OpenSSL developers are on this list. In case they are too
busy to
reply, below are some of the comments from the package:
Could someone with legal know-how translate whatever it is this is saying into
On Sun, 22 Sep 2002, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
It's just a gadget of the type you can't make a similar one again,
and that's what it can be used for. Forget about networks and
challenge response in context of this token.
Security is far more than just the cryptographical standard methods.
There's
bear wrote:
Anyway; it's nothing particularly great for remote authentication;
but it's *extremely* cool for local authentication.
Local authentication still has several optical issues that need to be answered,
and which may limit the field usefullness of a device based on laser speckle.
--- begin forwarded text
Status: RO
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.0.2006
Date: Sun, 22 Sep 2002 14:40:58 +0100
Subject: Re: unforgeable optical tokens?
From: David G.W. Birch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Bob Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Digital Bearer Settlement List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
