> Second, the court ruled that the preliminary injunction which the lower
> court had issued was an unconstitutional prior restraint on speech, but
> went out of its way not to answer whether damages and/or a permanent
> injunction after trial would suffer the same fate.
Actually, the fact tha
At 02:17 PM 11/3/2001 -0500, Steve Bellovin wrote:
>"SAN FRANCISCO (November 2, 2001 6:20 p.m. EST) - Publishing software
>code to decrypt and copy digital movies is protected by the First
>Amendment as an expression of free speech, a California appeals
>court ruled.
>
>"The state's 6th Appellate
"SAN FRANCISCO (November 2, 2001 6:20 p.m. EST) - Publishing software
code to decrypt and copy digital movies is protected by the First
Amendment as an expression of free speech, a California appeals
court ruled.
"The state's 6th Appellate District in San Jose found Thursday that
Andrew Bunner's
