On Sat, 1 Sep 2001 17:55:35 +0200 Seth David Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Later in your message you mentioned the need for
>
> Dan Geer writes:
> > containers that encapsulate content,
>
> in order to enforce control of information.
>
> On the technological side, privacy-protecting tec
Dan Geer writes:
> [ Pardon the delay; my e-mail home
> base of record is disintegrating
> plus I travel for a living. ]
>
>
>
> Thanks to all who remarked on-list or off.
>
> Yes, I am being simple but I think not simplistic, and I will
> be as brief as I can.
>
> Information can and mu
[ Pardon the delay; my e-mail home
base of record is disintegrating
plus I travel for a living. ]
Thanks to all who remarked on-list or off.
Yes, I am being simple but I think not simplistic, and I will
be as brief as I can.
Information can and must be owned as property. If we depart o
Dan Geer wrote:
>You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
>owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
>you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
Not sure I agree, because of the scope of initial and subsequent distribution
and
On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Dan Geer wrote:
>
>> Content control is a dead end.
>
>Folks,
>
>You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
>owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
>you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
>
>It reall
Dan Geer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
> owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
> you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
A tempting but false proposition, on two grounds.
First, pr
Dan Geer writes:
> > Content control is a dead end.
>
> Folks,
>
> You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
> owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
> you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
>
> It really is time to be
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:19:31PM -0400, Dan Geer wrote:
| > Content control is a dead end.
| You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
| owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
| you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
|
> Content control is a dead end.
Folks,
You only get an even number of {privacy, copyright} -- either the
owner of information controls how it is used or he does not. Either
you embrace copyright-and-privacy, or you embrace neither.
It really is time to be careful what you ask for.
--dan
ion: Real Measures
Subject: Outreach Volunteers Needed - Content Control is a Dead End
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sending this because I am looking for concerned individuals who
understand the importance of the following cause:
Content control is a dead end.
The legal tradition
10 matches
Mail list logo
