I have a news analysis up at News.com that, perhaps, may shed some
light on what's actually going on:
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-980671.html
-Declan
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:25:01AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
The New York Times is reporting at
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
the system
John Gilmore[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Nomen writes:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat
Nomen said:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
