About that MS security response initiative ...
I think, if you view their security response team as a completely
separate independent entity from the MS development team,
you'll find that they're making a valiant attempt at doing an
impossible job.
Scott Culp is just trying to rally the
At 08:52 PM 10/16/2001 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Laurie writes:
Trei, Peter wrote:
Windows XP at least checks for drivers not signed by MS, but
whose security this promotes is an open question.
Errr ... surely this promotes MS's bottom line and no-one's
David Jablon writes:
Not until vendors are held legally accountable for negligent design.
Maybe someday, somehow, there will be a class action law suit.
(I saw a recent infosec conference flyer that had some silly quote
about the annual cost of viruses or something being in the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ben Laurie writes:
Trei, Peter wrote:
Windows XP at least checks for drivers not signed by MS, but
whose security this promotes is an open question.
Errr ... surely this promotes MS's bottom line and no-one's security? It
is also a major pain if you happen to want
