[Moderator's note: I think this is slipping from relevance... --Perry]
Faust wrote:
Here's a little story: this week I learned that one of our valuable
security doctoral candidates doesn't vote, and doesn't want to learn
about or discuss politics and the political implications of what she
At 09:54 PM 1/25/2003 +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But there is a strong economic rationale. We save untold operational
expense, support costs, and legal fees. (The legal cost of complying with
that single interstate subpoena cost us an entire
With all due respect to the commentator and the tremendous amount that
he has contributed to the community, I had to go eat a pint of ice cream
and cool down, I was so incensed after reading his comments. Here's my
attempt at a rational reply:
John Young wrote:
It will be more expensive to
Here's a little story: this week I learned that one of our valuable
security doctoral candidates doesn't vote, and doesn't want to learn
about or discuss politics and the political implications of what she does.
Sounds very sensible to me.
Leave the voting to those who care.
One of my
Declan McCullagh wrote:
At 06:15 PM 1/21/2003 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:
He's placed the decision here:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/verizon.riaa.decision.012103.pdf
All this to learn the identity of a computer at a particular IP address.
Presumbly, Verizon will now be smart
William Allen Simpson says, of the Verizon decision:
wrote:
All this to learn the identity of a computer at a particular IP address.
Presumbly, Verizon will now be smart enough to say: All of our IP
addresses are assigned using DHCP, and we have no record of the name
of any subscriber associated
That would be a wise move. That would continue for about three weeks, and
then we'd see a bill out of Congress demanding that ISPs retain identity
for, oh, maybe seven years?
UK law enforcement is already asking for this for two years, and subscriber
details (name, address, payment mechanisms
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 16:18:47 -, Ian Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That would be a wise move. That would continue for about three weeks, and
then we'd see a bill out of Congress demanding that ISPs retain identity
for, oh, maybe seven years?
UK law enforcement is already asking for this
Declan McCullagh recently posted an interesting article on a legal
opinion:
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-981449.html
He's placed the decision here:
http://www.politechbot.com/docs/verizon.riaa.decision.012103.pdf
All this to learn the identity of a computer at a particular IP address.
