Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

Hynek, You’re correct, I accidentally switched the two projects in my first sentence. I agree that the plans look fine to me, although I’m not sure how much time I’ll have to contribute at all. Thanks, Dominic > On Jan 6, 2016, at 5:10 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote: > > Hello Dominic, > >> Am

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

Hello Dominic, > Am 05.01.2016 um 06:11 schrieb Dominic Chen : > > To add on to the existing discussion, I agree with deprecating cryptography > in favor of pyopenssl, although personally I’d prefer to see pyopenssl > continue providing an updated low-level OpenSSL interface. I assume that’s a

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

To add on to the existing discussion, I agree with deprecating cryptography in favor of pyopenssl, although personally I’d prefer to see pyopenssl continue providing an updated low-level OpenSSL interface. As a bit of background, I originally started using pyopenssl when I was writing a researc

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

> On Jan 4, 2016, at 5:59 AM, Hynek Schlawack wrote: > > AFAIK, there hasn’t been a PR refused for this reason so far but there have > always been awkward nudges in that direction. Sorry, I probably contributed to some confusion there. I thought I saw earlier in the thread that PRs had been r

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

[responding to myself because MailRoute had hiccups when Paul sent his response and I never got it.] I’m glad I’ve met unequivocal support so far. [Paul]: > There's no reason why we can't do this technically. My past opposition has > mostly been philosophical (if we do this we inextricably tie

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

> On Dec 28, 2015, at 1:51 AM, Cory Benfield > wrote: > > >> On 28 Dec 2015, at 09:35, Hynek Schlawack mailto:h...@ox.cx>> >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around >> improving the state of x509 objects in gene

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

On December 28, 2015 at 3:43:02 AM, Hynek Schlawack (h...@ox.cx) wrote: Hi,  we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around improving the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it.  Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because cryptogr

Re: [Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

> On 28 Dec 2015, at 09:35, Hynek Schlawack wrote: > > Hi, > > we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around > improving the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it. > > Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because > cryptograph

[Cryptography-dev] Keys/Certificates/CRLs/x509 in pyOpenSSL

Hi, we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around improving the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it. Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because cryptography has routines for that, I wonder if we should close them all as WONTF