Hi,
we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around improving
the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it.
Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because cryptography
has routines for that, I wonder if we should close them all as WONTF
> On 28 Dec 2015, at 09:35, Hynek Schlawack wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around
> improving the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it.
>
> Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because
> cryptograph
On December 28, 2015 at 3:43:02 AM, Hynek Schlawack (h...@ox.cx) wrote:
Hi,
we have quite a bit of pull requests on pyOpenSSL that revolve around improving
the state of x509 objects in general as far as I understand it.
Since I already got reprimanded by Alex G for merging one because cryptogr