On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Peter Gutmann wrote:
I would add to this the observation that rather than writing yet another SSL
library to join the eight hundred or so already out there, it might be more
useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
to join the zero or
Peter Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you want a VPN that road warriors can use, you have to do it with IP-over-
TCP. Nothing else survives NAT and agressive firewalling, not even Microsoft
PPTP.
IP-over-TCP has some potential performance problems, see
Peter Clay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having spent much of the past few weeks trying to sort out a workable VPN
solution, I think this is a good but doomed idea. http://vpn.ebootis.de/
has the best free windows IPsec configuration tool I've found, but that
doesn't help. Why? Because IPsec
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 01:56:47AM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
I would add to this the observation that rather than writing yet another SSL
library to join the eight hundred or so already out there, it might be more
useful to create a user-friendly management interface to IPsec implementations
http://www.hindustantimes.com/onlineCDA/PFVersion.jsp?article=http://10.81.141.122/news/181_410767,0008.htm
HindustanTimes.com
Defence research facility burgled
Soni Sangwan, Vishal Thapar and Vibha Sharma
New Delhi,?October 9
Nineteen computers belonging to top-secret establishments of
Jill Ramonsky wrote:
Too late. I've already started. Besides which, posts on this group
suggest that there is a demand for such a toolkit.
I think there's demand in the sense that there's demand for free
lunches. People would like the inherent complexity to go away, because
they can see that
