also sprach Ed Gerck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004.05.28.1853 +0200]:
It's industry support. We know what it means: multiple,
conflicting approaches, slow, fragmented adoption -- will not
work.
In other words change. If you have any alternatives to change,
please describe them.
Perry E. Metzger said:
This article claims the code for the permissive action links on many
US nuclear weapons in the 1960s was well known to be .
http://www.cdi.org/blair/permissive-action-links.cfm
Just 3 years ago I was looking at a portal site for airline pilots. They
had a
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/05/30/opinion/30SUN1.html?th=pagewanted=printposition=
The New York Times
May 30, 2004
MAKING VOTES COUNT
Who Tests Voting Machines?
henever questions are raised about the reliability of electronic voting
machines, election officials have a ready response:
On Sat, 29 May 2004, Russell Nelson wrote:
Eugen Leitl writes:
If I'm a node in a web of trust (FOAF is a human), prestige will
percolate through it completely. That way I can color a whole
domain with a nonboolean trust hue, while a domain of fakers will
have only very few connections
On May 27, 2004, at 12:35 PM, John Kelsey wrote:
Does anyone know whether the low-power nature of wireless LANs
protects them from eavesdropping by satellite? Is there some simple
reference that would easily let me figure out whether transmitters at
a given power are in danger of eavesdropping
