On Tue, Feb 14, 2006 at 04:26:35PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Werner Koch writes:
> >I agree. However the case at hand is a bit different. I can't
> >imagine how any application or upper layer will be able to recover
> >from that error (ENOENT when opening
"Steven M. Bellovin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>According to the BBC, the British government is talking to Microsoft about
>putting in a back door for the file encryption mechanisms.
That's one way of looking at it. It's not really a backdoor, it's a way of
spiking DRM. If the UK government c
Ok the lurker posts...Can someone explain to me why security specialists think this:"The system uses BitLocker Drive Encryption through a chip called TPM (Trusted Platform Module) in the computer's motherboard."
is going to stop authorities from retreiving data?I ask this question on the basis of t
Chris Olesch wrote:
> Ok the lurker posts...
>
> Can someone explain to me why security specialists think this:
>
> "The system uses BitLocker Drive Encryption through a chip called TPM
> (Trusted Platform Module) in the computer's motherboard."
>
> is going to stop authorities from retreiving d
