Ivan Krstić wrote:
I think it's anything but surprising. There's only so much you can do to
significantly improve systems security if you're unwilling to break
backwards compatibility -- many of the fundamental premises of desktop
security are fatally flawed, chief among them the idea that all
I've heard nothing formal, but my strong understanding is a lot of US
government machines, at least if we're talking workstations on
non-classified nets, are in fact 0wn3d at this point.
Well, here's an anecdote: at last year's CEAS conference, Rob Thomas
of Team Cymru gave the keynote on the
