On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Damien Miller d...@mindrot.org wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, James A. Donald wrote:
If one uses a higher resolution counter - sub
microsecond - and times multiple disk accesses, one gets
true physical randomness, since disk access times are
effected by
See http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/security-fail-5.
-Michael Heyman
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to majord...@metzdowd.com
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Nicolas
Williamsnicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
But that's not what I'm looking for here. I'm looking for the fastest
MACs, with extreme security considerations...In the crypto world
one never designs weak-but-fast algorithms on purpose, only
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Peter Gutmannpgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
mhey...@gmail.com mhey...@gmail.com writes:
2) If you throw TCP processing in there, unless you are consistantly going to
have packets on the order of at least 1000 bytes, your crypto algorithm is
almost _irrelevant_
From http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/07/iphone-encryption/:
the supposedly enterprise-friendly encryption included with the iPhone 3GS
is so weak it can be cracked in two minutes with a few pieces of
readily available
freeware...“I don’t think any of us [developers] have ever seen
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 11:52 PM, Udhay Shankar Nud...@pobox.com wrote:
Interesting article. Anyone here have experience trying to
reverse-engineer malware that uses really good crypto?
I haven't done this personally but I have worked with people who do.
Typically, the type of encryption isn't
A Stick Figure Guide to the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES)
(A play in 4 acts)
http://www.moserware.com/2009/09/stick-figure-guide-to-advanced.html
-Michael Heyman
-
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 7:10 AM, Peter Gutmann pgut...@cs.auckland.ac.nz wrote:
...does anyone know of any significant use [of split keys] by
J.Random luser? I'm interested in this from a usability point
of view.
Maybe not J.Random but J.Corporate...
A few jobs ago back in the late '90s, I
