RE: recommendations/evaluations of free / low-cost crypto libraries
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Gutmann Sent: 29 juin 2004 09:49 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: recommendations/evaluations of free / low-cost crypto libraries Anton Stiglic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A list can be found here http://www.homeport.org/~adam/crypto/ Hmm, that list is somewhat out of date (several years in some cases). Indeed. Adam started that list in 1996, but I don't think he put allot of time updating it in recent years. Still, I think it's a good list for someone who is starting to look for crypto libraries. It would be nice gift to the community if someone came up with a similar, updated list. --Anton - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: recommendations/evaluations of free / low-cost crypto libraries
Anton Stiglic [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: A list can be found here http://www.homeport.org/~adam/crypto/ Hmm, that list is somewhat out of date (several years in some cases). Peter. - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: recommendations/evaluations of free / low-cost crypto libraries
- Original Message - From: Amir Herzberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: recommendations/evaluations of free / low-cost crypto libraries I will appreciate experience-reports/evaluations/comparisons with free or low cost (and in particular zero `per seat` cost) crypto libraries, especially in C / C++ (or links to web-sites containing them). Generally the two most suggested free products are Crypto++ (http://www.eskimo.com/~weidai/cryptlib.html) and OpenSSL (http://www.openssl.org/). I have used both and both are very good toolsets, each has small advantages, but mostly it's just a programming style preference. As a personal preference, I generally preper OpenSSL for most purposes, because the interface feels better to me, but lately I've been using Crypto++ more because it supports a wider selection of algorithms (including the very important for me ECC variants) which is recently of extreme value to me. I will say that if either of these was pay-ware, I would gladly pay for it. Joe - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
