Re: [Cryptography] Summary of the discussion so far

2013-09-14 Thread Max Kington
On 13 Sep 2013, at 21:46, Nico Williams wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:17:35PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:53:28 -0500 Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Traffic analysis can't really be defeated, not in detail. What's wrong with mix networks?

Re: [Cryptography] Summary of the discussion so far

2013-09-13 Thread Nico Williams
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:03:44PM -0700, Nemo wrote: Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com writes: I have attempted to produce a summary of the discussion so far for use as a requirements document for the PRISM-PROOF email scheme. This is now available as an Internet draft.

Re: [Cryptography] Summary of the discussion so far

2013-09-13 Thread Perry E. Metzger
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:53:28 -0500 Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Traffic analysis can't really be defeated, not in detail. What's wrong with mix networks? Perry -- Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com ___ The cryptography

Re: [Cryptography] Summary of the discussion so far

2013-09-13 Thread Perry E. Metzger
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:46:58 -0500 Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 03:17:35PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote: On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:53:28 -0500 Nico Williams n...@cryptonector.com wrote: Traffic analysis can't really be defeated, not in detail.

Re: [Cryptography] Summary of the discussion so far

2013-09-11 Thread Nemo
Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com writes: I have attempted to produce a summary of the discussion so far for use as a requirements document for the PRISM-PROOF email scheme. This is now available as an Internet draft. http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hallambaker-prismproof-req-00.txt First,