I'm a bit concerned by this scheme. I'm not clear at the moment whether
you're proposing imposing it on all wikipedia users or just those that
want to access via Tor?
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:48:48AM +, Jason Holt wrote:
* Lack of forward secrecy is indeed an issue, since our metaphorical
On 10/3/05, Jason Holt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More thoughts regarding the tokens vs. certs decision, and also multi-use:
This is a good summary of the issues. With regard to turning client
certs on and off: from many years of experience with anonymous and
pseudonymous communication, the big
More thoughts regarding the tokens vs. certs decision, and also multi-use:
* Client certs are a pain to turn on and off. If you select ask me every
time before sending a client cert, you have to click half a dozen OKs per
page. (This could be mitigated by having Wikipedia only use the SSL
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 08:32:44 -0400
From: Paul Syverson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Subject: Re: Hooking nym to wikipedia
Hi Jason et al,
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 11:48:48AM +
