Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
Well spotted. Yes, I guess that's what Jim Youll was asking. And I
should have said "seemingly-contradictory". This is, of course, what I
meant by "marketeering": when someone asks if your service is insecu
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 02:58:15PM -0400, Arshad Noor wrote:
> So, what is it on the device that is using the 3DES key to encrypt
> chunks to send to the RIM messaging gateway?
Not "to the RIM gateway", "via the RIM gateway" the payload is destined
for a corporate messaging server.
> Something
1:10 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: Re: RIM to give in to GAK in India
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:05:17AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Arshad Noor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Even if RIM does not have the device keys, in order to share encrypted
> > data wi
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 10:05:17AM -0400, Derek Atkins wrote:
> Arshad Noor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Even if RIM does not have the device keys, in order to share encrypted
> > data with applications on the RIM server, the device must share a session
> > key with the server; must it not?
Arshad Noor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Even if RIM does not have the device keys, in order to share encrypted
> data with applications on the RIM server, the device must share a session
> key with the server; must it not?. Isn't RIM (their software, actually)
> now in a position to decrypt c
:12 AM (GMT-0800) America/Los_Angeles
Subject: Re: RIM to give in to GAK in India
Quoting "Derek Atkins"
Wow, and April 1st was almost two months ago. This is just a bunch
of FUD. If someone actually talked to RIM they would find out that
it's technically impossible for them to d
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 08:08:11PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
> Well spotted. Yes, I guess that's what Jim Youll was asking. And I
> should have said "seemingly-contradictory". This is, of course, what I
> meant by "marketeering": when someone asks if your service is insecure and
> interceptable
Florian Weimer wrote on 27 May 2008 18:49:
> * Dave Korn:
>
>>>In a major change of stance, Canada-based Research In Motion (RIM)
>>>may allow the Indian government to intercept non-corporate emails
>
>>>sent over
Isn't this just a semantic game on the part of RIM and the government?
The phrase "enterprise customers" would seem to isolate a class of
customers such that individual customers not using a corporate version
of the product would see their crypto weakened... and be subject to
monitoring thr
* Dave Korn:
>>In a major change of stance, Canada-based Research In Motion (RIM)
>>may allow the Indian government to intercept non-corporate emails
>>sent over BlackBerrys.
> Research In Motion (RIM), the Can
Perry E. Metzger wrote on 27 May 2008 16:14:
> Excerpt:
>
>In a major change of stance, Canada-based Research In Motion (RIM)
>may allow the Indian government to intercept non-corporate emails
>sent over BlackBerrys.
>
>
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Telecom/Govt_may_get_keys_t
Quoting "Perry E. Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Excerpt:
In a major change of stance, Canada-based Research In Motion (RIM)
may allow the Indian government to intercept non-corporate emails
sent over BlackBerrys.
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/Telecom/Govt_may_get_keys_to_your_Blac
12 matches
Mail list logo
