Re: Unpatented PAKE!
Scott G. Kelly wrote: Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-01.txt Hmmm. I don't see any IPR statements for that draft. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unpatented PAKE!
Scott G. Kelly wrote: Ben Laurie wrote: Scott G. Kelly wrote: Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-01.txt Hmmm. I don't see any IPR statements for that draft. My understanding is that there are no IPR claims on this method. I am not a lawyer, though. Given the stupidity of the US patent system, at least the authors need to state that they make no claims, AIUI. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.links.org/ There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit. - Robert Woodruff - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unpatented PAKE!
Ben Laurie wrote: Scott G. Kelly wrote: Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-01.txt Hmmm. I don't see any IPR statements for that draft. My understanding is that there are no IPR claims on this method. I am not a lawyer, though. --Scott - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unpatented PAKE!
[Moderator's note: Please do not top post. --Perry] Here's another approach to password authenticated key exchange with similar security claims. The underlying mechanism is under consideration for inclusion in by the 802.11s group in IEEE: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-harkins-emu-eap-pwd-01.txt -Original Message- From: Perry E. Metzger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 30, 2008 2:27 PM To: Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Cryptography cryptography@metzdowd.com Subject: Re: Unpatented PAKE! Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/passwdPK/submissions/hao-ryan-2008.pdf At last. See also: http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/05/29/j-pake/ Looks quite interesting indeed. Perry - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Unpatented PAKE!
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1363/passwdPK/submissions/hao-ryan-2008.pdf At last. See also: http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2008/05/29/j-pake/ Looks quite interesting indeed. Perry - The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending unsubscribe cryptography to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
