On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:16:02AM -0700, Paul Hoffman wrote:
[...]
Essentially no one would argue that is is quite expensive. I
suspect that nearly everyone in the country would be happy to pay an
additional $1/election for more reliable results.
Without seeing all of the expense (and
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 11:57 AM, John Ioannidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This just about sums it up: http://xkcd.com/463/
Only slightly better then suggested by the comic. McAfee anti-virus
software was on the servers, not the DRE voting machines themselves.
From
At 9:24 AM -0700 8/18/08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
(and because of the complexity of US elections,
hand counting is quite expensive)
This is quite disputable. Further, hand vs. machine counting is core
to the way we think about the security of the voting system.
On a complex ballot, there are
Paul Hoffman writes:
-+--
| At 9:24 AM -0700 8/18/08, Eric Rescorla wrote:
| (and because of the complexity of US elections,
| hand counting is quite expensive)
|
| This is quite disputable. Further, hand vs. machine counting is core
| to the way we think about the
