On 2013-11-15, at 1:33 AM, Jeffrey Goldberg jeff...@goldmark.org wrote:
So if we find (and I haven’t correlated what I’m
working on with actual passwords, so now this is hypothetical)
that ioxG6CatHBw appears for the last block of the encryption
of “password1”, then we know that that is the
On 14 November 2013 03:29, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the only thing I've seen (haven't really looked):
http://stricture-group.com/files/adobe-top100.txt
I have to ask: snoopy1 more popular than snoopy? wtf?
___
cryptography
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 14 November 2013 03:29, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the only thing I've seen (haven't really looked):
http://stricture-group.com/files/adobe-top100.txt
I have to ask: snoopy1 more popular than snoopy?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Patrick Mylund Nielsen
cryptogra...@patrickmylund.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Ben Laurie b...@links.org wrote:
On 14 November 2013 03:29, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
This is the only thing I've seen (haven't really looked):
On 2013-11-13, at 8:13 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Is anyone aware of a blacklist that includes those 150 million records
from Adobe's latest breach?
You are aware that these haven’t all been decrypted? (Or is there some
news I’ve missed.)
The passwords were encrypted,
On 15/11/13 06:35 AM, Kevin W. Wall wrote:
Besides that, (unfortunately) it's a lot easier to change 'snoopy1' to 'snoopy2'
then to 'snoopy3', etc. when your password inevitably changes. Plus, it makes
a lot easier to remember than to start out with 'sn00py' and then go
to 'sn11py',
'sn22py',
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 9:13 PM, Jeffrey Walton noloa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
Is anyone aware of a blacklist that includes those 150 million records
from Adobe's latest breach?
This is the only thing I've seen (haven't really looked):
http://stricture-group.com/files/adobe-top100.txt
I
Take a look at http://dazzlepod.com/uniqpass/
Previously, I’m just kept that file as is, and did a case-insentive binary
search directly on disk… took maybe 10 seeks ~ 1ms to see if something was
present or not and could be done via command line. No index required, no
loading required. I’m
