Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead

2002-05-29 Thread R. A. Hettinga
--- begin forwarded text Status: U Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 00:57:06 -0700 To: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Carl Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Here's my message to the author of that article.. - Carl

Re: FC: Hollywood wants to plug analog hole, regulate A-D converters

2002-05-29 Thread Jim Hughes
I will add one more gallon of fuel to this fire and then sit by and watch it burn... Imagine *if* there is a mandated change that there be some kind of digital content filter in all D-A and *if* there is *any* probability at all (no matter how small) that non-copyrighted material will trigger

Re: FC: Hollywood wants to plug analog hole, regulate A-D converters

2002-05-29 Thread Harry Hawk
From: Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, it's unlikely that anyone would embed watermarks in billboard ads, or in ads in general. Copying an ad is usually a Good Thing from... It's only the program material which needs protection. Well the talent (models, etc.) in the ads need

the anvil problem

2002-05-29 Thread Carl Ellison
At 05:04 PM 5/29/2002 -0400, Adam Fields wrote: Hughes, James P says: Change the billboard for elevator music (which will be protected). Will you be able to play back your digital dictations *if* they were recorded in an environment that included background music. IMHO, Silly does not mean

RE: FC: Hollywood wants to plug analog hole, regulate A-D converters

2002-05-29 Thread Carl Ellison
At 01:14 PM 5/29/2002 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Pete Chown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, May 26, 2002 8:05 AM David G. Koontz wrote: Can you imagine watermarks on billboard advertisements? How subliminal. Actually this would be weird. Suppose digital cameras