at Monday, December 16, 2002 5:19 PM, R. A. Hettinga
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was seen to say:
> As I've said here before...
>
> At 6:51 PM +0530 on 12/16/02, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
>
>
>> Peppercoin is
>
> ...Ron Rivest's random-settlement "lottery" payment protocol.
>
> Essentially, you write 10 c
TBH, I wouldn't bother.
use a server to store the documents, set folder permissions per group,
use some sort of lan encryption to protect the data in transit. Novell
is probably the best at this, but almost any file server will do.
Of course we now start into the lan encryption arguments :)
-
at Friday, January 31, 2003 2:18 AM, Peter Gutmann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was seen to say:
> More particularly, governments are likely to want to explore the
> issues related to potential foreign control/influence over domestic
> governmental use/access to domestic government held data.
> In othe
at Thursday, March 06, 2003 5:02 PM, Ed Gerck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was seen
to say:
> On the other hand, photographing a paper receipt behind a glass, which
> receipt is printed after your vote choices are final, is not readily
> deniable because that receipt is printed only after you confirm your
>
"Francois Grieu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then there is the problem that the printed receipt must not be usable
> to determine who voted for who, even knowing in which order the
> voters went to the machine. Therefore the printed receipts must be
> shuffled. Which brings us straight back to pap
