Re: [cryptopp-users] HIGHT/CTR mode selft tests are failing

Ok thx have nice day and good Time Satoshi Nakamoto Jeffrey Walton schrieb am Do. 28. Sept. 2023 um 19:46: > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:42 PM One Sini wrote: > > > > The issue you're encountering with Crypto++ 8.8.0, where the > CryptoPP::RabbitWithIV algorithm behaves unexpectedly when

Re: [cryptopp-users] HIGHT/CTR mode selft tests are failing

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 1:42 PM One Sini wrote: > > The issue you're encountering with Crypto++ 8.8.0, where the > CryptoPP::RabbitWithIV algorithm behaves unexpectedly when inString is equal > to outString, appears to be a potential problem in the library. This behavior > should not occur, as

Re: [cryptopp-users] HIGHT/CTR mode selft tests are failing

The issue you're encountering with Crypto++ 8.8.0, where the CryptoPP::RabbitWithIV algorithm behaves unexpectedly when inString is equal to outString, appears to be a potential problem in the library. This behavior should not occur, as the ProcessData function should allow the use of the same

[cryptopp-users] Re: Liking error with NDK 26

On Thursday, September 28, 2023 at 10:53:14 AM UTC-4 AndroidGuy wrote: I'm encounting linking error if I use NDK 26.0.10792818 using LLVM 17 to compile my project with Crypto 8.8, but it works fine with NDK 25.2.9519653 using LLVM 14. That's kind of interesting in a morbid sort of way.

[cryptopp-users] HIGHT/CTR mode selft tests are failing

Hi Everyone, HIGHT/CTR mode self tests are failing. The failures began when we added more self tests due to GH #1231, . We are tracking the issue at . Jeff -- You received this message

[cryptopp-users] Liking error with NDK 26

I'm encounting linking error if I use NDK 26.0.10792818 using LLVM 17 to compile my project with Crypto 8.8, but it works fine with NDK 25.2.9519653 using LLVM 14. *F:/Mobile-Modding/App-Project//jni/cryptopp/arm64-v8a/libcryptopp.a -latomic -target

Re: [cryptopp-users] Re: Build on Ubuntu 22.04

Thanks you for this answer. As you mentioned, the problem is relative to GCC. I already tried the last version of cryptopp which resulted in the same problem and did not find any point about this in cryptopp documentation. As you mentioned, my concern is about the same level of security in