Re: [Cscope-devel] Vim issue and patch submission

2011-02-20 Thread Ken Smith
2011/2/20 Hans-Bernhard Bröker : > On 17.02.2011 19:31, Ken Smith wrote: > I'm happy to learn that cscope already does what I want but so far, I don't think -P does.  I'm happy to be proven wrong. >>> >>> You don't want to pass $(pwd) to -P.  It's meant to be used like this: >>> >>>      

Re: [Cscope-devel] Vim issue and patch submission

2011-02-17 Thread Ken Smith
(readded cc: cscope-devel) 2011/2/16 Hans-Bernhard Bröker : > On 17.02.2011 01:56, Ken Smith wrote: >> >> 2011/2/16 Hans-Bernhard Bröker: >> >>> Actually, you would _always_ have to do cscope -R -b -q.  The ability to >>> concatenate single-letter options that don't use arguments is a GNU >>> feat

Re: [Cscope-devel] Vim issue and patch submission

2011-02-16 Thread Ken Smith
2011/2/16 Ken Smith : > 2011/2/16 Hans-Bernhard Bröker : > >> Actually, you would _always_ have to do cscope -R -b -q.  The ability to >> concatenate single-letter options that don't use arguments is a GNU feature >> offered by getopt_long().  No _GNU_SOURCE, no -Rbq. > > Ok.  I'm compiling on Linu

Re: [Cscope-devel] Vim issue and patch submission

2011-02-16 Thread Ken Smith
(resending because I didn't reply all) 2011/2/16 Hans-Bernhard Bröker : > Actually, you would _always_ have to do cscope -R -b -q. The ability to > concatenate single-letter options that don't use arguments is a GNU feature > offered by getopt_long(). No _GNU_SOURCE, no -Rbq. Ok. I'm compilin

[Cscope-devel] Vim issue and patch submission

2011-02-16 Thread Ken Smith
Hi all, I am a long time cscope user but this is the first time I think I have found a potential issue. I have built cscope from an anonymous CVS checkout from an hour ago. The first thing I notice is that I can no longer do cscope -Rbq I must do cscope -R -b -q Also, when I try to use the c