Sorry, forgot to send my reply to the list as well...
Hello from Australia!
On 1/27/07, Fred Janon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I love it! So simple of a solution! How didn't I think of it! Great,
> thanks Zoe! By the way the negative margin or padding doesn't work in IE,
> depending on what do
Still, if you ever end up with a page where there is a small amount of
content - especially on a big screen - that container will still stretch to
the bottom of the page, leaving a largely empty column.
...but I'm glad it's working!
Try adding...
>
> html, body {height: 100%;}
> #container {min-h
http://cmasters.townnews.com/entertainment/
>> Is there any way to make my columns line up in IE quirks mode the
>> same as they are lining up in Firefox? What is IE quirks mode
>> calculating differently in the box model other than padding?
>Your layout is "pixel-tight" without a single p
Thank you very much. This is something I haven't tried yet. I'm new to
CSS and don't think of these solutions very easily. I know there must be
a way!
I'll try this out.
Robyn
~davidLaakso wrote:
> Robyn M. Smith wrote:
>> I'm trying to find a way to have a two-color horizontal navigation
>> a
Thanks to all.
Sorry if I'm looking for answers in the wrong place. I'm new to CSS and
perhaps don't use all the proper terms.
This is not a structural division. It's just a presentational issue.
I don't have a url, I've been testing locally. But to try and explain
what I mean: some sites have
On 26/01/07, Jonathan Berry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I found this on a W3C working draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr),
> but it doesn't seem to be supported by either Mozilla or IE. Any knowledge
> of this, Oh CSS gurus?
It was an idea that was thrown about a few years ag
Christine Masters wrote:
>>> http://cmasters.townnews.com/entertainment/
> Is there any way to make my columns line up in IE quirks mode the
> same as they are lining up in Firefox? What is IE quirks mode
> calculating differently in the box model other than padding?
Your layout is "pixel-tigh
Robyn M. Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to have a two-color horizontal navigation area:
> for example, a yellow background on the left half and a blue background
> on the right half.
>
> Robyn Smith
>
Simple is difficult. Complicated is easy. And if you are even nicer to
Opera, all
I've been editing a theme for my gallery software to my liking, and
think I understand the CSS that it's using. However i have render
problems in IE 5.5 and 6 which i just can't fix. I haven't got a clue
what's causing it.
The URL is: http://jg.intellit.nl/cm
Problem is that IE adds about 20-30px
Hello all,
I found this on a W3C working draft (http://www.w3.org/TR/css-style-attr),
but it doesn't seem to be supported by either Mozilla or IE. Any knowledge
of this, Oh CSS gurus?
http://www.w3.org/"; style="{color: #900} :link {background:
#ff0} :visited
{background: #fff} :hover {outline: th
> Christine Masters wrote:
> > Anyway, I've gotten it to work well in Firefox, but I'm having some
> > trouble working with IE.
> > http://cmasters.townnews.com/entertainment/
> The line-up will be improved in IE6 when the 'margin-doubling on floats'
> bug is "killed".
> The addition of...
Robyn,
I guess you can go one of two ways:
Create two unordered lists and float them next to each other calling the
one red and the other yellow:
#red-nav, #red-nav ul {
position:relative;
float:left;
}
#yellow-nav, #yellow-nav ul {
position:relative;
float:left;
}
or,
I am having a problem rendering a CSS styled unordered list in IE 6.
I'm using the list as a navigation system, and I've also used a javascript
library to make a "flyout" menu from the list. You can browse the site using
the following site (you'll only see the problem if you're using IE 6):
I'm trying to find a way to have a two-color horizontal navigation area:
for example, a yellow background on the left half and a blue background
on the right half. I've tried using nested divs to divide a navbar area
into two regions with their own styling. It works, but, of course, this
falls
Hi,
I'm experiencing a problem with IE6. I have a div that takes its size from
its content, which is both text and one image. In Firefox and IE7 the height
of the div is properly calculated, but in IE6 only text is taken into
account.
You can see the effect here: http://www.vieira.es/test/index.h
On 1/26/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > li a {display: block;}
> If I do this, then the entire navigation bar will be horizontal all
> of a sudden:
I don't see why. All that rule says is that every a element inside an
li element should be displayed in block
On 1/26/07, Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No offense to the microformats advocates, but I think this data ought to
> be in a table. It will be much more accessible that way, and easier for
> you to style to boot.
Agreed. It's tabular in nature and each column has a distinct
mea
| Try adding...
| html, body {height: 100%;}
| #container {min-height: 100%;}
| * html #container {height: 100%;}
| ...and restyle the background to avoid visible overflow...
| html, body {background: #fff url(../images/bg.jpg) center repeat-y; }
Perfect. That took care of both of my issues. Thank
http://www.copelandcasati.com/test/steelisgreen/about.htm
Three issues, any help is VALUABLE!
1. I want the sun to align to the bottom of that leftnav bar and can't
achieve it
2. in Firefox the text has huge gaps in it next to photos UNTIL you hit
"refresh"
3. In IE (I don't kn
John M Shepard wrote:
> I have a problem with a practice site I put up at: www.mypracticesite.com.
> There seems to be a problem in the css for the subpages rendering properly
> in IE 6 & 7 on a Windows based machine.
I believe you have one too many tags immediately before the
element . Remove o
also sprach Zoe M. Gillenwater <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.01.26.1952 +]:
> Give the ul the same amount of top and bottom padding. That's how
> padding works on inline elements -- it pushes out content to the left
> and right, but not above and below. The linebox doesn't expand to hold
> that
Hey all, I've got a template where I've got to use only inline CSS
*sigh* with no style sheet reference in the tag.
Obviously, this has some limitations. Is there a way to affect all
tags in a given area with inline CSS?
Example.
I basically want the effect of this:
#header p
{
margin: 5px
Christina Hope wrote:
> Basically this is close...I probably should explain it a bit better.
> Basically I'm looking for the "look of tables" but without using tables.
> So I need everything that should be a column ex - fn, department, role,
> note etc. to left align in what would be the cell in th
martin f krafft wrote:
> http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/leistungen/1.html
> http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/css/screen.css
>
> If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
> the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
> elements (as we
My apologies for cross-posting
I'd appreciate any comment that would help me improve this article:
http://www.tjkdesign.com/articles/how_to_style_a_code_listing.asp
Thanks.
---
Regards,
Thierry | www.TJKDesign.com
__
css-discuss
Daniel Hammond wrote:
> Sadly, none of that did anything to fix the problem. Any ideas on making the
> container extend down to 100% of the vertical space?
Keep in mind that once you have content in the page this will probably
become a non-issue. I wouldn't worry about it.
Zoe
--
Zoe M. Gillen
> "A" is an inline element and so of course rules designed for
> application to block elements won't work. Fortunately you can make
> them work with "display: block;" - for example
>
> li a {display: block;}
If I do this, then the entire navigation bar will be horizontal all
of
Grady Kelly wrote:
> I am building a UI for a web application. I am using 100% heights for a lot
> of the outer elements, like this:
>
> - this has 100% height
> - this has 100% height
> - this has 100% height
> - this has 100% height
>
>
> this works all fine and dandy. the problem that I a
Testing
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http:
Jim wrote:
> Would anyone in the U.S. have any tips regarding Section 508 compliance, or
> any links to sites that may have CSS tips?
>
Section 508 and CSS have very little to do with one another. The only
Section 508 requirements with a CSS implication is the rule to not have
information co
Marian,
One thing to note about all your pages: they contain a number of
validation errors, and cleaning these up first should be done before any
of the other things I mention. It's the best start towards a well
rendering page.
Marian Rosenberg wrote:
> http://www.anandatour.com.cn/test/index.
Fred Janon wrote:
> I have a UL with some LIs. I want a 1px border around all the LIs with no
> 2px border between the LIs. I have been fiddling around with the UL and LIs
> borders but I can't find a simple solution to it. My best solution so far is
> to have no border on the UL and the top, left,
I stand corrected; thanks for the reference. :-)
Andy
On 1/26/07, Chris Ovenden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IE doesn't get thrown into quirks mode just becuase it finds some tag soup
> in the body. The switch is in the
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quirks_mode#Triggering_different_renderi
Daniel Hammond wrote:
> Any ideas on making the container extend down to 100% of the vertical
> space?
Try adding...
html, body {height: 100%;}
#container {min-height: 100%;}
* html #container {height: 100%;}
...and restyle the background to avoid visible overflow...
html, body {background: #
Hi there.
I have a problem with a practice site I put up at: www.mypracticesite.com.
There seems to be a problem in the css for the subpages rendering properly
in IE 6 & 7 on a Windows based machine.
Any help would be great.
Thanks. John Shepard
__
>
> Sadly, none of that did anything to fix the problem. Any ideas on making
> the
> container extend down to 100% of the vertical space?
Well, for starters, you might want to think about changing your use of that
background image. If you make the container div wide enough to contain the
image b
| ...place your text-align: center
| declaration on the body, not on the container. (That is, I
| think you intend to use this to correctly center your layout
| for IE 5. If that's the case, put it on the body element
| instead.) That *might* fix your problem.
|
| ...shrink the image by two pix
Thanks Everyone for the help!
I was able to tweak Chris's example to accomplish the layout that I am
needing.
I think that because I was just starting using floats for positioning, that
I did not even thing to absolute position them.
Thanks Again!
Grady
On 1/25/07, Chris Pallé <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Chris Ovenden wrote:
> Some may disagree, but I feel "* html" is completely safe and
> future-proof. We know precisely which browsers it hits, and their
> behaviour is frozen forevermore.
I agree :-)
...we know - now!
To quote myself from back in 2005:
"I see the arrival of IE7 as an oppor
Hello Taryn,
Friday, January 26, 2007, 1:33:55 PM, you wrote:
> Hi everyone-
> Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
> Especially on a mac and IE 7.
using:
Laptop 1680x1050 132% normal Size (127 dpi)Windows XP SP2
IE7
Note I'm using a laptop contrast light Grey/white for readi
I'm not sure if this will actually fix your problem, but I think you
intended to place your text-align: center declaration on the body, not on
the container. (That is, I think you intend to use this to correctly center
your layout for IE 5. If that's the case, put it on the body element
instead.) T
for some reasons the links havent been pasted corectly:
me inside a table >
http://www.webcssdesign.34sp.com/me/flashoo/mePoorTable.html
me without table >
http://www.webcssdesign.34sp.com/me/flashoo/meWithoutTable.html
thanks for whom who will help
Neo
On 1/26/07, Shlomi Asaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/26/07, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear list,
> If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
> the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
> elements (as well as ) I was using to try to make the
> navigation bars a bit thicker doesn't actual
Taryn Regish wrote:
> Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
> Especially on a mac and IE 7.
re: xp
Performed well for me in ie/7.0 through ie/5.01. FWIW, there are
vertical gaps between the menu items in ie/5.01, but the menu and pages
are perfectly usable. There is an interestin
Dear list,
I am fighting with
http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/leistungen/1.html
http://seamus.madduck.net/~madduck/abacons6/css/screen.css
If you look at the top menu bar as well as the subcategories below
the page's , you'll see how the vertical padding on the
elements (as well
Here's the URL:
www.objectivedesigns.com/2
Everything is correct in FF and Opera, but IE shifts the container/header
one pixel to the left. You can see it if you look closely and compare the
edges in relation to the background gradients.
Also, I want the black left and right borders of the contai
Seems fine in IE7
On 1/26/07, Taryn Regish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi everyone-
>
> Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
>
> Especially on a mac and IE 7.
>
>
--
Chris Ovenden
http://thepeer.blogspot.com
"Imagine all the people / Sharing all the world"
___
Some may disagree, but I feel "* html" is completely safe and future-proof.
We know precisely which browsers it hits, and their behaviour is frozen
forevermore.
On 1/26/07, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> There's no such thing as a 'safe bug/hack', only some that are a bit
> safer
> Hi everyone-
>
> Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
>
> Especially on a mac and IE 7.
>
> Thanks.
No problems in Safari, Camino and FF on Mac.
Cheers
George
www.shapeshed.com | Web and Graphic Design
__
css-
Hi everyone-
Can I please get a site check on http://ifpsm.ism.ws/
Especially on a mac and IE 7.
Thanks.
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7 information -- http://css-discuss.in
Hi
here r two pages:
me without
table&
me
inside a
table
as u can see, the PRE element is OverFlow:Auto inside a 95% width table
displays worse. (in IE6 (haven't tested on IE7))
why is that? can i correct this bug?
thanks a lot
NeoSwf
--
www.webcssdesign.34sp.com
_
Barney Carroll wrote:
> The syntax for @import is pretty unique for CSS, to be fair to IE
> (we're always so patronising).
Well, @import has been around for a while...
It has also been used as a filter to block out old browsers, for years -
without the media-attribute.
> I google searched the w3
Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
> The IE-bug that makes the '@import hack' work, also prevents proper use
> of attributes on a standardized property. This means it put limitations
> on future use of same property, and will continue to do so for as long
> as our support for those same buggers is a necessary p
IE doesn't get thrown into quirks mode just becuase it finds some tag soup
in the body. The switch is in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quirks_mode#Triggering_different_rendering_modes
Chris
On 1/26/07, james shannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd imagine Andy meant that IE won't internally
Christine Masters wrote:
> Anyway, I've gotten it to work well in Firefox, but I'm having some
> trouble working with IE.
> http://cmasters.townnews.com/entertainment/
The line-up will be improved in IE6 when the 'margin-doubling on floats'
bug is "killed".
The addition of...
#tnent_movies_con
Hi everyone!
I could use a little help with a layout I'm working on. It is my first
tableless CSS site, so I'm possibly missing some obvious things. Thanks in
advance for any advice!
Anyway, I've gotten it to work well in Firefox, but I'm having some trouble
working with IE.
Here is my
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
> Gunlaug Sørtun wrote:
>> Guess I shouldn't say this, but, FWIW: It is good to have options
>> and know how they work an/or how to make them work. However, I
>> don't see much point in switching hacking-strategy if one has a
>> working and well-tested method in place.
>
57 matches
Mail list logo
