linojon wrote:
> Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
>
> When this page is viewed in Firefox or Safari, and you hover over any
> of the list items, you can link to the 'overlaid' link. But in IE7,
> you must only hover over whitespace to have a link; if you h
linojon wrote:
> Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
> Is there a way to force IE to make the entire a link? or a
> better way to accomplish this that works in all browsers? (and
> preferably without using javascript)
With a few additional properties/values in t
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of linojon
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:27 PM
> To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: [css-d] forcing an entire to be a link
>
> Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.co
Take a look at this article and demo:
http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000230.php
Jim
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:27 PM, linojon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
>
> When this page is viewed in Firefox or Safari, and you hove
Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
When this page is viewed in Firefox or Safari, and you hover over any
of the list items, you can link to the 'overlaid' link. But in IE7,
you must only hover over whitespace to have a link; if you hover over
text it wants
Sandy wrote:
> or so i think.
>
> http://accuray.com/
>
> my flash menu is in an absolutely position div. in ie6 ONLY, when you
> roll over "products" or "patients", the menu is cut off at the bottom of
> the drop down.
> I tried fooling around with the other positioned elements or removing
>
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Rob Emenecker <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using a negative text indent to "hide" the button label, is not what I
> would
> label as a "best practice" -- IMO. Are the button values dynamically
> changing? If not, why even have text for the value attribute? There's
http://edu.olyortho.com/
Please tell me there is some way to fix this! Go to the above page,
type a letter into the search box, and an autocomplete DIV will
appear. Problem is, the Flash animation below it seems to take
priority and cover the DIV.
Is there any way to fix this, maybe using z-ind
Hi Corey,
I would simplify your button code to something like this:
.some_btn { background:transparent url(../images/some_btn.gif) no-repeat
center center; border:none; cursor:pointer; height:26px; line-height:26px;
text-align:center; margin:0; overflow:hidden; padding:0; width:99px;
}
Then use
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
> I shared the "position:relative" fix for links, but that one is not
> my finding. I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack
> ;)
I guess (and hope) this will be a very short-lived filter, so it can remain
unnamed :-)
(Btw, it was Ingo that mentioned here
Alex Robinson wrote:
> Now, as an aside and not being particularly expert on quirks mode
> rendering, are there any specific differences (other than the ones
> just discussed) that anyone is aware of between IE6 quirks mode and
> IE7 quirks mode? (I'm fully aware of their being many standards mode
Using a negative text indent to "hide" the button label, is not what I would
label as a "best practice" -- IMO. Are the button values dynamically
changing? If not, why even have text for the value attribute? There's no
reason -- scripting-wise that it makes sense to do it.
Why? Simple. In most all
Hello all,
I have been trying to accommodate a design spec involving intricately styled
buttons w/ rounded corners I have been sourcing out best of practices
and after trial and error, am leaning towards the use of image as form
button element ... however the techniques I have tested use t
Matthew Stoneback wrote:
> I have never seen this site on a Mac, can someone out
> there hook me up with any issues.
>
>
> http://www.eddysound.com/rrc/index_help.html
>
>
> Matt Stoneback
>
>
In Mac OS X 10.4.11
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12)
Gecko/20080201
Hello everyone -
I have had some help through this list in getting this site to where it is,
now I need some help debugging it. My main areas of concern are IE 6 and 7,
but any other browser checks would be great.
My specific concerns:
In IE 6 - The right column gets pushed down and under the l
> > Thierry, come on, share what you discovered. :-)
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> I shared the "position:relative" fix for links, but that one is not my
> finding.
> I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack ;)
> --
> Regards,
> Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
I have notice a few passing
Jason Crosse wrote:
> I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
> in relative units?
It's an interesting question, though not a CSS question as such. It may
be relevant in CSS authoring, though, since you can turn a space into an
element and then try to set its width.
On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Rob Emenecker wrote:
> The width of a word space will vary depending upon the font you are
> working
> with. In most cases it falls somewhere between a thin (1/3 em) and
> an en
> (1/2 em) space. For web page treatments I usually just use 0.4em or
> 0.5em
> for
The width of a word space will vary depending upon the font you are working
with. In most cases it falls somewhere between a thin (1/3 em) and an en
(1/2 em) space. For web page treatments I usually just use 0.4em or 0.5em
for a standard width word space.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
> but harking back to my days of letterpress printing
And you've got the lead burn scars to prove it, right?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss
On Tue, March 11, 2008 4:58 pm, Jason Crosse wrote:
> I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
> in relative units? I want to pad a one-line element's left side so
> it looks like a space has been inserted.
>
> Is there a reliable way of doing this (e.g 0.5ex;), or does i
I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
in relative units? I want to pad a one-line element's left side so
it looks like a space has been inserted.
Is there a reliable way of doing this (e.g 0.5ex;), or does is just
depend on how big a given font's space is?
If it's
On 3/10/08 10:46 PM, "Karl Hardisty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/03/2008, at 3:38 PM, Kathy Wheeler wrote:
>
> On 11/03/2008, at 12:34 PM, Michael Stevens wrote:
>> WeBuilder from Bluementals
>> http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
>
> WeBuilder is windows only.
>
>> -Original Messag
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> discuss.org] On Behalf Of Alan Gresley
> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:50 AM
> To: Mark Richards
> Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
> Subject: Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly
> broken
Hi Susan,
Thanks for pointing that out. I completely missed something that obvious. Ugh.
Thank you again.
--Stephen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Susan Grossman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> You need to remove padding/margin from the form itself:
>
> form {
> margin:0;
> padding:
Last night I replaced visability:hidden with display:none in my
implementation of Lightbox's slideshow. It works fine (and just as
described, the extra space that the visibility property put on my page has
now been eliminated with the display property).
It's not necessary for accessibility for
Alex Robinson wrote:
> At 22:36 -1000 9/3/08, david wrote:
>> If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
>> document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
>> mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
>> does the browser some
>Aren't Mac people always bragging about how their machines can run Windows
>better than a PC can? Shouldn't be a problem then... :)
This is all completely off topic. It would have been ruled so earlier
but evidently us moderators were either sleeping or dead.
This list has 8500+ members and a
The html validator indicates a BOM in addition
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-disc
29 matches
Mail list logo
