On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 15:43:38 -0700
Karl Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howdy,
I'm really ready to dump BBedit, and am wondering if anyone has a
good html/css editor with autocomplete like many of the current
tools, but also has the built-in ftp capabilities of BBedit? I am
seeing
The html validator indicates a BOM in addition
--
http://www.satzansatz.de/css.html
http://www.dolphinsback.com
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Aren't Mac people always bragging about how their machines can run Windows
better than a PC can? Shouldn't be a problem then... :)
This is all completely off topic. It would have been ruled so earlier
but evidently us moderators were either sleeping or dead.
This list has 8500+ members and a
Alex Robinson wrote:
At 22:36 -1000 9/3/08, david wrote:
If you have an HTML document that happens to contain another HTML
document in an iframe - and one of the two documents triggers quirks
mode when rendered by itself - is each one rendered in the same mode or
does the browser somehow do
Last night I replaced visability:hidden with display:none in my
implementation of Lightbox's slideshow. It works fine (and just as
described, the extra space that the visibility property put on my page has
now been eliminated with the display property).
It's not necessary for accessibility for
Hi Susan,
Thanks for pointing that out. I completely missed something that obvious. Ugh.
Thank you again.
--Stephen
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Susan Grossman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You need to remove padding/margin from the form itself:
form {
margin:0;
padding:0;
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of Alan Gresley
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 7:50 AM
To: Mark Richards
Cc: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: Re: [css-d] Targeting IE8 (was: IE8 is better but still slightly
broken)
On 3/10/08 10:46 PM, Karl Hardisty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/03/2008, at 3:38 PM, Kathy Wheeler wrote:
On 11/03/2008, at 12:34 PM, Michael Stevens wrote:
WeBuilder from Bluementals
http://www.blumentals.net/webuilder/
WeBuilder is windows only.
-Original Message-
Karl
I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
in relative units? I want to pad a one-line element's left side so
it looks like a space has been inserted.
Is there a reliable way of doing this (e.g 0.5ex;), or does is just
depend on how big a given font's space is?
If
On Tue, March 11, 2008 4:58 pm, Jason Crosse wrote:
I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
in relative units? I want to pad a one-line element's left side so
it looks like a space has been inserted.
Is there a reliable way of doing this (e.g 0.5ex;), or does is
but harking back to my days of letterpress printing
And you've got the lead burn scars to prove it, right?
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
The width of a word space will vary depending upon the font you are working
with. In most cases it falls somewhere between a thin (1/3 em) and an en
(1/2 em) space. For web page treatments I usually just use 0.4em or 0.5em
for a standard width word space.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
On Mar 11, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Rob Emenecker wrote:
The width of a word space will vary depending upon the font you are
working
with. In most cases it falls somewhere between a thin (1/3 em) and
an en
(1/2 em) space. For web page treatments I usually just use 0.4em or
0.5em
for a
Jason Crosse wrote:
I've got a pretty basic question. How wide is a typographical space
in relative units?
It's an interesting question, though not a CSS question as such. It may
be relevant in CSS authoring, though, since you can turn a space into an
element and then try to set its width.
Thierry, come on, share what you discovered. :-)
Hi Alan,
I shared the position:relative fix for links, but that one is not my
finding.
I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack ;)
--
Regards,
Thierry | http://www.TJKDesign.com
I have notice a few passing bugs. Take
Hello everyone -
I have had some help through this list in getting this site to where it is,
now I need some help debugging it. My main areas of concern are IE 6 and 7,
but any other browser checks would be great.
My specific concerns:
In IE 6 - The right column gets pushed down and under the
Matthew Stoneback wrote:
I have never seen this site on a Mac, can someone out
there hook me up with any issues.
http://www.eddysound.com/rrc/index_help.html
Matt Stoneback
In Mac OS X 10.4.11
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12)
Gecko/20080201
Hello all,
I have been trying to accommodate a design spec involving intricately styled
buttons w/ rounded corners I have been sourcing out best of practices
and after trial and error, am leaning towards the use of image as form
button element ... however the techniques I have tested use
Using a negative text indent to hide the button label, is not what I would
label as a best practice -- IMO. Are the button values dynamically
changing? If not, why even have text for the value attribute? There's no
reason -- scripting-wise that it makes sense to do it.
Why? Simple. In most all
Alex Robinson wrote:
Now, as an aside and not being particularly expert on quirks mode
rendering, are there any specific differences (other than the ones
just discussed) that anyone is aware of between IE6 quirks mode and
IE7 quirks mode? (I'm fully aware of their being many standards mode
Thierry Koblentz wrote:
I shared the position:relative fix for links, but that one is not
my finding. I'm pretty sure this ie8 filter is called the Bruno hack
;)
I guess (and hope) this will be a very short-lived filter, so it can remain
unnamed :-)
(Btw, it was Ingo that mentioned here that
Hi Corey,
I would simplify your button code to something like this:
.some_btn { background:transparent url(../images/some_btn.gif) no-repeat
center center; border:none; cursor:pointer; height:26px; line-height:26px;
text-align:center; margin:0; overflow:hidden; padding:0; width:99px;
}
Then
http://edu.olyortho.com/
Please tell me there is some way to fix this! Go to the above page,
type a letter into the search box, and an autocomplete DIV will
appear. Problem is, the Flash animation below it seems to take
priority and cover the DIV.
Is there any way to fix this, maybe using
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Rob Emenecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Using a negative text indent to hide the button label, is not what I
would
label as a best practice -- IMO. Are the button values dynamically
changing? If not, why even have text for the value attribute? There's no
Sandy wrote:
or so i think.
http://accuray.com/
my flash menu is in an absolutely position div. in ie6 ONLY, when you
roll over products or patients, the menu is cut off at the bottom of
the drop down.
I tried fooling around with the other positioned elements or removing
them
Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
When this page is viewed in Firefox or Safari, and you hover over any
of the list items, you can link to the 'overlaid' link. But in IE7,
you must only hover over whitespace to have a link; if you hover over
text it wants
Take a look at this article and demo:
http://www.smileycat.com/miaow/archives/000230.php
Jim
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 9:27 PM, linojon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
When this page is viewed in Firefox or Safari, and you hover
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
discuss.org] On Behalf Of linojon
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 9:27 PM
To: css-d@lists.css-discuss.org
Subject: [css-d] forcing an entire li to be a link
Here's a demo of my problem
linojon wrote:
Here's a demo of my problem http://www.parkerhill.com/hover-test.html
Is there a way to force IE to make the entire li a link? or a
better way to accomplish this that works in all browsers? (and
preferably without using javascript)
With a few additional properties/values in
29 matches
Mail list logo
