Stuart King wrote:
> If I have a 2 column layout with a footer.
>
> The content background is 780px by 412px.
>
> How do I make sure that the content div is the same dimensions, even with
> little content (I want the entire background to show)
>
> example:
>
> http://www.triviumwine.com/continuum_s
Alan K Baker wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a need for an entire index page to be contained within an anchor, so
> that anyone visiting the site would have to simply click anywhere within the
> page to bring up the next screen.
>
> As tags can't contain s , does anyone have a technique to achiev
Sorry . . .
If I have a 2 column layout with a footer.
The content background is 780px by 412px.
How do I make sure that the content div is the same dimensions, even with
little content (I want the entire background to show)
example:
http://www.triviumwine.com/continuum_site/pages/vision.html
Stuart King wrote:
> I am probably not explaining myself. H ow do I make sure that the
> content div is the same dimensions, even with little content (I want
> the entire background to show) as the entire background with the
> footer underneath
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 9:44 PM, David Laa
Stuart King wrote:
>
>
> I am still having trouble. How do I get the footer down underneath the
> wrapper. The height of the body should be 412 px with the footer
> (CONTINUUM) directly below.
>
>
> URL
> http://www.triviumwine.com/continuum_site/pages/vision.html
>
>
> thanks.
>
> --s
I a
Hi CSS'ers . . .
I am still having trouble. How do I get the footer down underneath the
wrapper. The height of the body should be 412 px with the footer (CONTINUUM)
directly below.
URL
http://www.triviumwine.com/continuum_site/pages/vision.html
thanks.
--s
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 11:52 PM, D
It is showing up in all browsers...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kit Grose [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:26 AM
> To: Matt Tibbits
> Cc: css-d
> Subject: Re: [css-d] space in horizontal nav
>
> Matt,
>
> If the issue is only showing up in IE, try removing all
G'day all,
I've run into a bug that's (of course) only affecting IE6, but I'm
interested to see if anyone else has a better fix for me. You can see
the bug in action at http://www.iqmultimedia.com.au/kit/displaynonebug.html
The test is a fixed-width container (with overflow:hidden) with four
Matt,
If the issue is only showing up in IE, try removing all the whitespace
between the list items in the markup.
- Kit
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http:/
Hello,
I think I've seen a fix for this before but I can't find it right now.
I've got a mysterious space between items in a horizontal nav bar. I
don't want to use floats because I would like the list to be centered on the
page. If anyone can help it would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Alan K Baker wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a need for an entire index page to be contained within an anchor, so
> that anyone visiting the site would have to simply click anywhere within the
> page to bring up the next screen.
>
> As tags can't contain s , does anyone have a technique to achieve
On Apr 4, 2008, at 5:55 AM, vincent pollard wrote:
> yeah i mean the css for declaring all the properties at once.
>
> i'm wondering that when you use this if you need to declare all
> values?
> ie sems to let you declare some but is it correct to put the values
> for all
> the properties, eg.
Boštjan Kern wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I'll make this short and sweet:
> - browser: Opera 9+
> - problem: text-indent doesn't work on , so I can't use
> a background-image to style it
>
> I'm out of ideas, but I'd rather not use input type=image. Any ideas guys
> (and gals)?
>
You could try with
Hi all.
I have a need for an entire index page to be contained within an anchor, so
that anyone visiting the site would have to simply click anywhere within the
page to bring up the next screen.
As tags can't contain s , does anyone have a technique to achieve this?
Regards,
Alan.
www.theat
I moved around a toolbar on a CMS template I have been working on with links
called HOME, TAGS, SEARCH, and FEED. I copied over the CSS code for the
toolbar section to my current CSS file and got it to work OK in firefox.
My problem is I do not see the graphical icons for HOME, TAGS, SEARCH, and
F
Now that's what I call a useful resource. Amazing how these little gems appear
just when you need them.
Thanks Rahul. :-)
Regards,
Alan.
www.theatreorgans.co.uk
www.virtualtheatreorgans.com
Admin: Conn Artistes, UKShopsmiths, 2nd Touch & AP Groups
Shopsmith 520 & bits
Flatulus Antiquitus
-
Sorry, I haven't time to wade through entire stylesheets tonight, but assuming
that your stylesheets don't do anything 'clever' with table definitions, it
looks as if your divs are wrapped by tags which AFAIK would
follow each other in the HTML 'flow', so each table will appear below the last
Andrew Doades wrote:
> Nope, I removed that width control from the css but still IE is refusing
> to show it correctly, I did use FireBug in FireFox to check this out and
> FireBug seems to agree that it's ok!
Without a link we have know idea what IE is doing. Which versions of IE
are you refe
Morgan Aldridge wrote:
> Excellent, that did the trick. So I take it that it is/was a bug in
> Firefox 2 with the way it handles z-indexes of absolute positioned
> elements which are children of elements with hidden overflows? Messes
> it up in the stacking context somehow?
I wouldn't call it
Nope, I removed that width control from the css but still IE is refusing
to show it correctly, I did use FireBug in FireFox to check this out and
FireBug seems to agree that it's ok!
Is this an IE problem, like the Microsoft way to be a pain, or am I
missing something!?
BTW, Alan when I send
Nope, I removed that width control from the css but still IE is refusing
to show it correctly, I did use FireBug in FireFox to check this out and
FireBug seems to agree that it's ok!
Is this an IE problem, like the Microsoft way to be a pain, or am I
missing something!?
Alan Gresley wrote:
>
Andrew Doades wrote:
> In my css file:
>
> #sidebar {
> float:left;
> width:165px;
> border: 3px solid #aaa;
> background-color: #eee;
> margin:2px;
> padding: 1em;
> }
>
> #content-main {
> float:none;
> width:100%;
> }
>
> then in my template I just put that links a
In my css file:
#sidebar {
float:left;
width:165px;
border: 3px solid #aaa;
background-color: #eee;
margin:2px;
padding: 1em;
}
#content-main {
float:none;
width:100%;
}
then in my template I just put that links and that in a
and a content-main one for content
Alan
Farid Jamea wrote:
> But that particular line is the exact fix that you suggested to me
> when I asked a different question about two months ago :-)
What works depends on what it's supposed to work in/with. The fix could
only work when the right section is as tall or taller than the left
section,
hey richard,
yeah i mean the css for declaring all the properties at once.
http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_font.asp
i'm wondering that when you use this if you need to declare all values?
ie sems to let you declare some but is it correct to put the values for all
the properties, eg.
font: normal n
On 4/4/08, vincent pollard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there anything buggy about the way firefox reads these that i should know
> about?
> i'm getting some weird results.
>
By "font" do you mean the element in HTML, or the css shorthand
property? http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-CSS21/fonts.html#pr
As has been said, without some code, it's difficult to tell what the problem
is. However, it sounds like a classic case of 'float-drop. Try reducing the
width of your contents box and ensure that whatever's inside your contents box
can't actually overflow it.
Regards,
Alan.
www.theatreorgans
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Gunlaug Sørtun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Morgan Aldridge wrote:
>
> > http://images.smalldog.com/stacking_context_test.xhtml
>
> Anyway, delete...
>
> #sidebar{overflow: hidden;}
>
> ...and the stacking will be fine across browser-land.
Excellent, that did the
Cristian Palmas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What are the problems with the star hack into IE7?
> Must I use conditional comments or there are other ways?
> I hope so...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
For IE7 specifically, the star HTML hack can still be done, but with a
"+" symbol, as in * + html.
- HP
But that particular line is the exact fix that you suggested to me
when I asked a different question about two months ago :-)
Here is my original question:
http://markmail.org/search/?q=atlantagoldenrugs.com&q=list%3Aorg.css-discuss.lists.css-d#query:atlantagoldenrugs.com%20list%3Aorg.css-discuss.l
is there anything buggy about the way firefox reads these that i should know
about?
i'm getting some weird results.
--
Vincent Pollard
http://www.ithinkx.co.uk
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/l
Cristian Palmas wrote:
> What are the problems with the star hack into IE7?
No problems ... IE7 doesn't recognize the 'star html' hack when in
standard mode, only when in quirks mode.
> Must I use conditional comments or there are other ways?
I use the @media hack to serve IE7 and older version
Farid Jamea wrote:
> Hello, Please take a look at this page (www.atlantagoldenrugs.com) in
> IE7 and Firefox. As you can see, the last item in the left navigation
> bar is "PGI Rugs". If you look at the page in IE6, the nav bar is cut
> off at TajMahal.
IE6 does exactly what you're telling it to d
Hello,
Please take a look at this page (www.atlantagoldenrugs.com) in IE7 and
Firefox. As you can see, the last item in the left navigation bar is
"PGI Rugs". If you look at the page in IE6, the nav bar is cut off at
TajMahal. An screenshot can be found here:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3159/238
On 03-Apr-08, at 10:59 PM, Andrew Doades wrote:
> On my site I have a sidebar that is set to float left, and then
> content that is set to float none. This works and looks fine in
> FireFox but in IE the content slips below the sidebar
Without a URI, it is difficult to pinpoint the problem af
On my site I have a sidebar that is set to float left, and then content
that is set to float none.
This works and looks fine in FireFox but in IE the content slips below
the sidebar?
I have tried a number of different css moves and html moves but keeps
resulting in the same problem
please hel
This contains everything except IE 7: http://tredosoft.com/Multiple_IE
This contains IE 7: http://tredosoft.com/IE7_standalone
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Cristian Palmas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can I install on my Win XP SP2 PC Internet Explorer 7 but keeping the
> IE6 for test
Hi,
Can I install on my Win XP SP2 PC Internet Explorer 7 but keeping the
IE6 for test purposes?
Thanks
--
~ Cristian Palmas ~
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ --
Hi,
What are the problems with the star hack into IE7?
Must I use conditional comments or there are other ways?
I hope so...
Thanks in advance.
--
~ Cristian Palmas ~
__
css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.css-discuss.org/
At 12:36 -0400 2/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Are there any good resources on the best way to create a
>standards/accessible totally CSS website with maximum Search Engine
>Optimization? In other
>words, how can I create a site using only xhtml and css and ensure
>that it will
>be found in t
Are there any good resources on the best way to create a
standards/accessible totally CSS website with maximum Search Engine
Optimization? In other
words, how can I create a site using only xhtml and css and ensure that it
will
be found in the search engines and at the highest possible li
If you site validates it means the code is clean and to the standards
set by the W3C. That should be goal number one.
If you website content contains your keywords and phrases you are paying
for or are targeting, you have done all you can do and all you should
expect CSS and XHTML to offer you.
I
The default is "all" ...
On Apr 1, 2008, at 6:29 PM, 5h4rk @ gmail wrote:
> Hi,
>
> can anyone tell me what is the default value for the media attribute
> for the stylesheet element? That is, when you don't set the media
> attribute.
>
> Thanks
> _
Bill,
Yes, thank you, it did work - perfectly in fact.
Cheers,
Harry
Bill Brown wrote:
> Hi Harry,
>
> You can fix this by removing the white space between your HTML tags,
> like so:
>
>>Home >Services Offered >About Us >Contact Us >
>
> Completely inelegant, I know, but it works.
> Hop
Blake wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have a bug where in IE7 the background of a LI is not appearing. The
> bug seems to be related to the fact that I have moved the anchor tags
> within using position: relative; because if I remove that piece of
> code the list appears almost as it should, only with the
Richard Grevers wrote:
> On 4/3/08, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> http://201.51.69.207:8081/fotos
>>
>> Take a look at the thumbs. Hover the mouse over them. You can see a "inner"
>> border is created. However, it isn't yet the way I wanted. Becouse of
46 matches
Mail list logo